Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 551

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety and Efficacy of a Recombinant Hepatitis E Vaccine

Shrestha, Mrigendra Prasad, Scott, Robert McNair, Joshi, Durga Man, Mammen, Mammen P., Thapa, Gyan Bahadur, Thapa, Narbada, Myint, Khin Saw Aye, Fourneau, Marc, Kuschner, Robert A., Shrestha, Sanjaya Kumar, David, Marie Pierre, Seriwatana, Jitvimol, Vaughn, David W., Safary, Assad, Endy, Timothy P., Innis, Bruce L.·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an important cause of viral hepatitis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an HEV recombinant protein (rHEV) vaccine in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: In Nepal, we studied 2000 healthy adults susceptible to HEV infection who were randomly assigned to receive three doses of either the rHEV vaccine or placebo at months 0, 1, and 6. Active (including hospital) surveillance was used to identify acute hepatitis and adverse events. The primary end point was the development of hepatitis E after three vaccine doses. RESULTS: A total of 1794 subjects (898 in the vaccine group and 896 in the placebo group) received three vaccine doses; the total vaccinated cohort was followed for a median of 804 days. After three vaccine doses, hepatitis E developed in 69 subjects, of whom 66 were in the placebo group. The vaccine efficacy was 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.6 to 98.6). In an intention-to-treat analysis that included all 87 subjects in whom hepatitis E developed after the first vaccine dose, 9 subjects were in the vaccine group, with a vaccine efficacy of 88.5% (95% CI, 77.1 to 94.2). Among subjects in a subgroup randomly selected for analysis of injection-site findings and general symptoms (reactogenicity subgroup) during the 8-day period after the administration of any dose, the proportion of subjects with adverse events was similar in the two study groups, except that injection-site pain was increased in the vaccine group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In a high-risk population, the rHEV vaccine was effective in the prevention of hepatitis E. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00287469 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa061847

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 551

Metadata

Authors
Shrestha, M. P., Scott, R. M., Joshi, D. M., Mammen, M. P., Thapa, G. B., Thapa, N., Myint, K. S. A., Fourneau, M., Kuschner, R. A., Shrestha, S. K., David, M. P., Seriwatana, J., Vaughn, D. W., Safary, A., Endy, T. P., & Innis, B. L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-03
Volume
356
Issue
9
Pages
895-903
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2023136941
Cited by
551
References
0
FWCI
29.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and Efficacy of a Recombinant Hepatitis E Vaccine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa061847
The paper
Shrestha, M. P., Scott, R. M., Joshi, D. M., Mammen, M. P., Thapa, G. B., Thapa, N., Myint, K. S. A., Fourneau, M., Kuschner, R. A., Shrestha, S. K., David, M. P., Seriwatana, J., Vaughn, D. W., Safary, A., Endy, T. P., & Innis, B. L. (2007). Safety and Efficacy of a Recombinant Hepatitis E Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa061847

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.