Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 781

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aspirin and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Relation to the Expression of COX-2

Open access
Chan, Andrew T., Ogino, Shuji, Fuchs, Charles S.·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regular use of aspirin reduces the risk of a colorectal neoplasm, but the mechanism by which aspirin affects carcinogenesis in the colon is not well understood. METHODS: We estimated cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression by immunohistochemical assay of sections from paraffin-embedded colorectal-cancer specimens from two large cohorts of participants who provided data on aspirin use from a questionnaire every 2 years. We applied Cox regression to a competing-risks analysis to compare the effects of aspirin use on the relative risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2 in the tumor. RESULTS: During 2,446,431 person-years of follow-up of 82,911 women and 47,363 men, we found 636 incident colorectal cancers that were accessible for determination of COX-2 expression. Of the tumors, 423 (67%) had moderate or strong COX-2 expression. The effect of aspirin use differed significantly in relation to COX-2 expression (P for heterogeneity=0.02). Regular aspirin use conferred a significant reduction in the risk of colorectal cancers that overexpressed COX-2 (multivariate relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.78), whereas regular aspirin use had no influence on tumors with weak or absent expression of COX-2 (multivariate relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.26). The age-standardized incidence rate for cancers that overexpressed COX-2 was 37 per 100,000 person-years among regular aspirin users, as compared with 56 per 100,000 person-years among those who did not use aspirin regularly; in contrast, the rate for cancers with weak or absent COX-2 expression was 27 per 100,000 person-years among regular aspirin users, as compared with 28 per 100,000 person-years among nonregular aspirin users. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of aspirin appears to reduce the risk of colorectal cancers that overexpress COX-2 but not the risk of colorectal cancers with weak or absent expression of COX-2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa067208

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chan, A. T., Ogino, S., & Fuchs, C. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-05-24
Volume
356
Issue
21
Pages
2131-2142
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2037952228
Cited by
781
References
4
FWCI
38.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.