Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,810

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation

Open access
Ekberg, Henrik, Tedesco-Silva, Helio, Demirbas, Alper, Vítko, Štefan, Nashan, Björn, Gürkan, Alp, Margreiter, Raimund, Hugo, Christian, Grinyó, Josep M., Frei, Ulrich, Vanrenterghem, Yves, Daloze, Pierre, Halloran, Philip F.·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. The primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival. RESULTS: The mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa067411

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,810

Metadata

Authors
Ekberg, H., Tedesco-Silva, H., Demirbas, A., Vítko, Š., Nashan, B., Gürkan, A., Margreiter, R., Hugo, C., Grinyó, J. M., Frei, U., Vanrenterghem, Y., Daloze, P., & Halloran, P. F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-12-20
Volume
357
Issue
25
Pages
2562-2575
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2142288396
Cited by
1,810
References
0
FWCI
53.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa067411
The paper
Ekberg, H., Tedesco-Silva, H., Demirbas, A., Vítko, Š., Nashan, B., Gürkan, A., Margreiter, R., Hugo, C., Grinyó, J. M., Frei, U., Vanrenterghem, Y., Daloze, P., & Halloran, P. F. (2007). Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067411

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.