Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,733

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation

Open access
Miller, Leslie W., Pagani, Francis D., Russell, Stuart D., John, Ranjit, Boyle, Andrew J., Aaronson, Keith D., Conte, John V., Naka, Yoshifumi, Mancini, Donna, Delgado, Reynolds M., MacGillivray, Thomas E., Farrar, David J., Frazier, O.H.·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of left ventricular assist devices is an accepted therapy for patients with refractory heart failure, but current pulsatile volume-displacement devices have limitations (including large pump size and limited long-term mechanical durability) that have reduced widespread adoption of this technology. Continuous-flow pumps are newer types of left ventricular assist devices developed to overcome some of these limitations. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter study without a concurrent control group, 133 patients with end-stage heart failure who were on a waiting list for heart transplantation underwent implantation of a continuous-flow pump. The principal outcomes were the proportions of patients who, at 180 days, had undergone transplantation, had cardiac recovery, or had ongoing mechanical support while remaining eligible for transplantation. We also assessed functional status and quality of life. RESULTS: The principal outcomes occurred in 100 patients (75%). The median duration of support was 126 days (range, 1 to 600). The survival rate during support was 75% at 6 months and 68% at 12 months. At 3 months, therapy was associated with significant improvement in functional status (according to the New York Heart Association class and results of a 6-minute walk test) and in quality of life (according to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaires). Major adverse events included postoperative bleeding, stroke, right heart failure, and percutaneous lead infection. Pump thrombosis occurred in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous-flow left ventricular assist device can provide effective hemodynamic support for a period of at least 6 months in patients awaiting heart transplantation, with improved functional status and quality of life. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121472 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa067758

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,733

Metadata

Authors
Miller, L. W., Pagani, F. D., Russell, S. D., John, R., Boyle, A. J., Aaronson, K. D., Conte, J. V., Naka, Y., Mancini, D., Delgado, R. M., MacGillivray, T. E., Farrar, D. J., & Frazier, O. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-08-30
Volume
357
Issue
9
Pages
885-896
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2169138421
Cited by
1,733
References
1
FWCI
64.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa067758
The paper
Miller, L. W., Pagani, F. D., Russell, S. D., John, R., Boyle, A. J., Aaronson, K. D., Conte, J. V., Naka, Y., Mancini, D., Delgado, R. M., MacGillivray, T. E., Farrar, D. J., & Frazier, O. H. (2007). Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067758

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.