Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 583

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Patients with the Hypereosinophilic Syndrome with Mepolizumab

Open access
Rothenberg, Marc E., Klion, Amy D., Roufosse, Florence E., Kahn, Jean Emmanuel, Weller, Peter F., Simon, Hans-Uwe, Schwartz, Lawrence B., Rosenwasser, Lanny J., Ring, Johannes, Griffin, Elaine F., Haig, Ann E., Frewer, Paul I.H., Parkin, Jacqueline M., Gleich, Gerald J.·2008·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hypereosinophilic syndrome is a group of diseases characterized by persistent blood eosinophilia, defined as more than 1500 cells per microliter with end-organ involvement and no recognized secondary cause. Although most patients have a response to corticosteroids, side effects are common and can lead to considerable morbidity. METHODS: We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, mepolizumab, in patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome. Patients were negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene and required prednisone monotherapy, 20 to 60 mg per day, to maintain a stable clinical status and a blood eosinophil count of less than 1000 per microliter. Patients received either intravenous mepolizumab or placebo while the prednisone dose was tapered. The primary end point was the reduction of the prednisone dose to 10 mg or less per day for 8 or more consecutive weeks. RESULTS: The primary end point was reached in 84% of patients in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 43% of patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59 to 5.26; P<0.001) with no increase in clinical activity of the hypereosinophilic syndrome. A blood eosinophil count of less than 600 per microliter for 8 or more consecutive weeks was achieved in 95% of patients receiving mepolizumab, as compared with 45% of patients receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.94 to 6.45; P<0.001). Serious adverse events occurred in seven patients receiving mepolizumab (14 events, including one death; mean [+/-SD] duration of exposure, 6.7+/-1.9 months) and in five patients receiving placebo (7 events; mean duration of exposure, 4.3+/-2.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that treatment with mepolizumab, an agent designed to target eosinophils, can result in corticosteroid-sparing for patients negative for FIP1L1-PDGFRA who have the hypereosinophilic syndrome. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00086658 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa070812

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Rothenberg, M. E., Klion, A. D., Roufosse, F. E., Kahn, J. E., Weller, P. F., Simon, H.-U., Schwartz, L. B., Rosenwasser, L. J., Ring, J., Griffin, E. F., Haig, A. E., Frewer, P. I. H., Parkin, J. M., & Gleich, G. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2008-03-20
Volume
358
Issue
12
Pages
1215-1228
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2155730304
Cited by
583
References
3
FWCI
33.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Patients with the Hypereosinophilic Syndrome with Mepolizumab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa070812
The paper
Rothenberg, M. E., Klion, A. D., Roufosse, F. E., Kahn, J. E., Weller, P. F., Simon, H.-U., Schwartz, L. B., Rosenwasser, L. J., Ring, J., Griffin, E. F., Haig, A. E., Frewer, P. I. H., Parkin, J. M., & Gleich, G. J. (2008). Treatment of Patients with the Hypereosinophilic Syndrome with Mepolizumab. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa070812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.