Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Universal Antenatal Screening for Group B Streptococcus

Van Dyke, Melissa K., Phares, Christina R., Lynfield, Ruth, Thomas, Ann R., Arnold, Kathryn E., Craig, Allen S., Mohle-Boetani, Janet, Gershman, Ken, Schaffner, William, Petit, Susan, Zansky, Shelley M., Morin, Craig A., Spina, Nancy L., Wymore, Kathryn, Harrison, Lee H., Shutt, Kathleen A., Bareta, Joseph, Bulens, Sandra N., Zell, Elizabeth R., Schuchat, Anne, Schrag, Stephanie J.·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcal disease is one of the most common infections in the first week after birth. In 2002, national guidelines recommended universal late antenatal screening of pregnant women for colonization with group B streptococcus to identify candidates for intrapartum chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: We evaluated the implementation of the guidelines in a multistate, retrospective cohort selected from the Active Bacterial Core surveillance, a 10-state, population-based system that monitors invasive group B streptococcal disease. We abstracted data from the labor and delivery records of a stratified random sample of live births and of all cases in which the newborn had early-onset group B streptococcal disease (i.e., disease in infants <7 days of age) in 2003 and 2004. We compared our results with those from a study with a similar design that evaluated screening practices in 1998 and 1999. RESULTS: We abstracted records of 254 births in which the infant had group B streptococcal disease and 7437 births in which the infant did not. The rate of screening for group B streptococcus before delivery increased from 48.1% in 1998-1999 to 85.0% in 2003-2004; the percentage of infants exposed to intrapartum antibiotics increased from 26.8% to 31.7%. Chemoprophylaxis was administered in 87.0% of the women who were positive for group B streptococcus and who delivered at term, but in only 63.4% of women with unknown colonization status who delivered preterm. The overall incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal disease was 0.32 cases per 1000 live births. Preterm infants had a higher incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal disease than did term infants (0.73 vs. 0.26 cases per 1000 live births); however, 74.4% of the cases of group B streptococcal disease (189 of 254) occurred in term infants. Missed screening among mothers who delivered at term accounted for 34 of the 254 cases of group B streptococcal disease (13.4%). A total of 61.4% of the term infants with group B streptococcal disease were born to women who had tested negative for group B streptococcus before delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for universal screening were rapidly adopted. Improved management of preterm deliveries and improved collection, processing, and reporting of culture results may prevent additional cases of early-onset group B streptococcal disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0806820

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Van Dyke, M. K., Phares, C. R., Lynfield, R., Thomas, A. R., Arnold, K. E., Craig, A. S., Mohle-Boetani, J., Gershman, K., Schaffner, W., Petit, S., Zansky, S. M., Morin, C. A., Spina, N. L., Wymore, K., Harrison, L. H., Shutt, K. A., Bareta, J., Bulens, S. N., Zell, E. R., Schuchat, A., & Schrag, S. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-06-18
Volume
360
Issue
25
Pages
2626-2636
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2168418588
Cited by
415
References
0
FWCI
27.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Universal Antenatal Screening for Group B Streptococcus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0806820
The paper
Van Dyke, M. K., Phares, C. R., Lynfield, R., Thomas, A. R., Arnold, K. E., Craig, A. S., Mohle-Boetani, J., Gershman, K., Schaffner, W., Petit, S., Zansky, S. M., Morin, C. A., Spina, N. L., Wymore, K., Harrison, L. H., Shutt, K. A., Bareta, J., Bulens, S. N., Zell, E. R., . . . Schrag, S. J. (2009). Evaluation of Universal Antenatal Screening for Group B Streptococcus. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0806820

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.