The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The benefits of preoperative biliary drainage, which was introduced to improve the postoperative outcome in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by a tumor of the pancreatic head, are unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized trial, we compared preoperative biliary drainage with surgery alone for patients with cancer of the pancreatic head. Patients with obstructive jaundice and a bilirubin level of 40 to 250 micromol per liter (2.3 to 14.6 mg per deciliter) were randomly assigned to undergo either preoperative biliary drainage for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by surgery, or surgery alone within 1 week after diagnosis. Preoperative biliary drainage was attempted primarily with the placement of an endoprosthesis by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The primary outcome was the rate of serious complications within 120 days after randomization. RESULTS: We enrolled 202 patients; 96 were assigned to undergo early surgery and 106 to undergo preoperative biliary drainage; 6 patients were excluded from the analysis. The rates of serious complications were 39% (37 patients) in the early-surgery group and 74% (75 patients) in the biliary-drainage group (relative risk in the early-surgery group, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). Preoperative biliary drainage was successful in 96 patients (94%) after one or more attempts, with complications in 47 patients (46%). Surgery-related complications occurred in 35 patients (37%) in the early-surgery group and in 48 patients (47%) in the biliary-drainage group (relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.11; P=0.14). Mortality and the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head increases the rate of complications. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN31939699.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mizrahi, J. D., Surana, R., Valle, J. W., & Shroff, R. T. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30974-0 · Cited by 2,559
Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery
Strobel, O., Neoptolemos, J., Jäger, D., & Büchler, M. W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0112-1 · Cited by 943
Seufferlein, T., Bachet, J. B., Van Cutsem, E., & Rougier, P. (2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds224 · Cited by 389
The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia
Eloubeidi, M. A., Decker, G. A., Chandrasekhara, V., Chathadi, K. V., Early, D. S., Evans, J. A., Fanelli, R. D., Fisher, D. A., Foley, K., Hwang, J. H., et al. (2016) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.009 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Gaag, N. A., Rauws, E. A. J., van Eijck, C. H. J., Bruno, M. J., van der Harst, E., Kubben, F. J. G. M., Gerritsen, J. J. G. M., Greve, J. W., Gerhards, M. F., de Hingh, I. H. J. T., Klinkenbijl, J. H., Nio, C. Y., de Castro, S. M. M., Busch, O. R. C., van Gulik, T. M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Gouma, D. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2010-01-14
- Volume
- 362
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-137
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2133853120
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0903230
- The paper
- van der Gaag, N. A., Rauws, E. A. J., van Eijck, C. H. J., Bruno, M. J., van der Harst, E., Kubben, F. J. G. M., Gerritsen, J. J. G. M., Greve, J. W., Gerhards, M. F., de Hingh, I. H. J. T., Klinkenbijl, J. H., Nio, C. Y., de Castro, S. M. M., Busch, O. R. C., van Gulik, T. M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Gouma, D. J. (2010). Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0903230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.