The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Some 50% of patients with visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) worldwide live in the Indian state of Bihar. Liposomal amphotericin B is an effective treatment when administered in short courses. We wanted to determine whether the efficacy of a single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B was inferior to conventional parenteral therapy, consisting of 15 alternate-day infusions of amphotericin B deoxycholate. METHODS: In this open-label study, we randomly assigned 412 patients in a 3:1 ratio to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (liposomal-therapy group) or amphotericin B deoxycholate (conventional-therapy group). Liposomal amphotericin B (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) was given once, and patients were discharged home 24 hours later. Amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was administered in 15 infusions of 1 mg per kilogram, was given every other day during a 29-day hospitalization. We determined the cure rate 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients--304 of 304 patients (100%) in the liposomal-therapy group and 106 of 108 patients (98%) in the conventional-therapy group--had apparent cure responses at day 30. Cure rates at 6 months were similar in the two groups: 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.4 to 97.9) in the liposomal-therapy group and 96.3% (95% CI, 92.6 to 99.9) in the conventional-therapy group. Adverse events in the liposomal-therapy group were infusion-related fever or rigors (in 40%) and increased anemia or thrombocytopenia (in 2%); such events in the conventional-therapy group were fever or rigors (in 64%), increased anemia (in 19%), and hypokalemia (in 2%). Nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity developed in no more than 1% of patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS: A single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B was not inferior to and was less expensive than conventional therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00628719.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity
Hamill, R. J. (2013) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4 · Cited by 807
Stone, N. R. H., Bicanic, T., Salim, R., & Hope, W. (2016) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-016-0538-7 · Cited by 537
Sundar, S., Sinha, P. K., Rai, M., Verma, D. K., Nawin, K., Alam, S., Chakravarty, J., Vaillant, M., Verma, N., Pandey, K., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62050-8 · Cited by 337
Self-citationLiposomal amphotericin B and leishmaniasis: Dose and response
Sundar, S., & Chakravarty, J. (2010) · Journal of Global Infectious Diseases · doi:10.4103/0974-777x.62886 · Cited by 217
Self-citationJarvis, J. N., Leeme, T. B., Molefi, M., Chofle, A. A., Bidwell, G., Tsholo, K., Tlhako, N., Mawoko, N., Patel, R. K. K., Tenforde, M. W., et al. (2019) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy515 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Sundar, S., Chakravarty, J., Agarwal, D., Rai, M., & Murray, H. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2010-02-11
- Volume
- 362
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 504-512
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2072809427
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0903627
- The paper
- Sundar, S., Chakravarty, J., Agarwal, D., Rai, M., & Murray, H. W. (2010). Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0903627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.