Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 919

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Trial of Treatment for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

Open access
Frobell, Richard B., Roos, Ewa M., Roos, Harald P., Ranstam, Jonas, Lohmander, L. Stefan·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial involving 121 young, active adults with acute ACL injury in which we compared two strategies: structured rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction and structured rehabilitation with the option of later ACL reconstruction if needed. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 2 years in the average score on four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--pain, symptoms, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS(4); range of scores, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]). Secondary outcomes included results on all five KOOS subscales, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the score on the Tegner Activity Scale. RESULTS: Of 62 subjects assigned to rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction, 1 did not undergo surgery. Of 59 assigned to rehabilitation plus optional delayed ACL reconstruction, 23 underwent delayed ACL reconstruction; the other 36 underwent rehabilitation alone. The absolute change in the mean KOOS(4) score from baseline to 2 years was 39.2 points for those assigned to rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction and 39.4 for those assigned to rehabilitation plus optional delayed reconstruction (absolute between-group difference, 0.2 points; 95% confidence interval, -6.5 to 6.8; P=0.96 after adjustment for the baseline score). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to secondary outcomes. Adverse events were common in both groups. The results were similar when the data were analyzed according to the treatment actually received. CONCLUSIONS: In young, active adults with acute ACL tears, a strategy of rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction was not superior to a strategy of rehabilitation plus optional delayed ACL reconstruction. The latter strategy substantially reduced the frequency of surgical reconstructions. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Medical Faculty of Lund University and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN84752559.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0907797

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.2106/JBJS.D.01842 · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJMcp0804745 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0363546507307396 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1186/1471-2474-10-100 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00505.x · DOI
  6. Linko E, 2005, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD001356
  7. 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002568 · DOI
  8. 10.1056/NEJMc082471 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0363546508328121 · DOI
  10. 10.2522/ptj.20060041 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cct.2006.10.002 · DOI
  12. Tegner Y, 1985, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 198, 43, 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.ptsp.2004.02.003 · DOI
  14. Jones KG, 1970, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 52, 838, 10.2106/00004623-197052070-00002 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/036354659602400605 · DOI
  16. Biau DJ, 2007, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 458, 180, 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803dcd6b · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/0363546504271211 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Khanna AJ, 2001, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83, 128, 10.2106/00004623-200100022-00011 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1998.tb00465.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Roos EM, 1998, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 28, 88, 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/0363546507308939 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1007/s00167-008-0654-3 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/1477-7525-1-64 · DOI
  24. Andersson C, 1989, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71, 965, 10.2106/00004623-198971070-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sandberg R, 1987, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 69, 1120, 10.2106/00004623-198769080-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.049403 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00816.x · DOI
  28. 10.2106/JBJS.H.01577 · DOI
  29. Aglietti P, 2004, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86, 2143, 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/0363546504268406 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1302/0301-620X.84B3.12400 · DOI
  32. Ejerhed L, 2003, Am J Sports Med, 31, 19, 10.1177/03635465030310011401 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.11685 · DOI
  34. Jansson KA, 2003, Am J Sports Med, 31, 12, 10.1177/03635465030310010501 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.014 · DOI
  36. 10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2106/JBJS.H.01455 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Frobell, R. B., Roos, E. M., Roos, H. P., Ranstam, J., & Lohmander, L. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-07-22
Volume
363
Issue
4
Pages
331-342
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2081204360
Cited by
919
References
1
FWCI
49.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.