Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 854

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis

Open access
Cooper, Bruce A., Branley, Pauline, Bulfone, Liliana, Collins, John F., Craig, Jonathan C., Fraenkel, Margaret B., Harris, Anthony, Johnson, David W., Kesselhut, Joan, Li, Jing Jing, Luxton, Grant, Pilmore, Andrew, Tiller, David J., Harris, David C., Pollock, Carol A.·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, there is considerable variation in the timing of the initiation of maintenance dialysis for patients with stage V chronic kidney disease, with a worldwide trend toward early initiation. In this study, conducted at 32 centers in Australia and New Zealand, we examined whether the timing of the initiation of maintenance dialysis influenced survival among patients with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients 18 years of age or older with progressive chronic kidney disease and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 10.0 and 15.0 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area (calculated with the use of the Cockcroft-Gault equation) to planned initiation of dialysis when the estimated GFR was 10.0 to 14.0 ml per minute (early start) or when the estimated GFR was 5.0 to 7.0 ml per minute (late start). The primary outcome was death from any cause. RESULTS: Between July 2000 and November 2008, a total of 828 adults (mean age, 60.4 years; 542 men and 286 women; 355 with diabetes) underwent randomization, with a median time to the initiation of dialysis of 1.80 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 2.23) in the early-start group and 7.40 months (95% CI, 6.23 to 8.27) in the late-start group. A total of 75.9% of the patients in the late-start group initiated dialysis when the estimated GFR was above the target of 7.0 ml per minute, owing to the development of symptoms. During a median follow-up period of 3.59 years, 152 of 404 patients in the early-start group (37.6%) and 155 of 424 in the late-start group (36.6%) died (hazard ratio with early initiation, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.30; P=0.75). There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of adverse events (cardiovascular events, infections, or complications of dialysis). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, planned early initiation of dialysis in patients with stage V chronic kidney disease was not associated with an improvement in survival or clinical outcomes. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, 12609000266268.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1000552

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 854

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, B. A., Branley, P., Bulfone, L., Collins, J. F., Craig, J. C., Fraenkel, M. B., Harris, A., Johnson, D. W., Kesselhut, J., Li, J. J., Luxton, G., Pilmore, A., Tiller, D. J., Harris, D. C., & Pollock, C. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-08-12
Volume
363
Issue
7
Pages
609-619
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2112353268
Cited by
854
References
17
FWCI
53.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1000552
The paper
Cooper, B. A., Branley, P., Bulfone, L., Collins, J. F., Craig, J. C., Fraenkel, M. B., Harris, A., Johnson, D. W., Kesselhut, J., Li, J. J., Luxton, G., Pilmore, A., Tiller, D. J., Harris, D. C., & Pollock, C. A. (2010). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1000552

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.