The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends
Abstract
Since the beginning of maintenance therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) through dialysis or transplantation, the number of patients treated for terminal kidney failure worldwide has continued to grow at a rate that is far in excess of the growth rate of the general population. By 2001, more than 1 million patients were reported worldwide to receive dialysis treatment alone, with the numbers growing at an annual global average rate of 7% [1,2]. The main factors contributing to the continued growth are the universal ageing of populations, multi-morbidity, higher life-expectancy of treated ESRD patients and increasing access of a generally younger patient population to treatment in countries in which access had previously been limited [3–6]. Solutions targeting the prevention or reversal of renal disease receive widespread attention, but have as yet failed to significantly change the development of global patient numbers. A superior and financially viable alternative to dialysis or allograft transplantation for chronic renal failure is not foreseen for the near or even mid-term future [6–9]. In order to facilitate effective future planning by healthcare authorities, reliable and up-to-date information on ESRD patient numbers, development trends, treatment modalities and treatment outcomes are indispensable. An increasing number of national and international renal registries have provided valuable demographic and epidemiologic information on renal patients since the first report of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA) was published in 1965 [6,10–17]. These reports provide a base for comparison between specified patient populations and an understanding of treatment practices and policies and their implications for the well-being of those undergoing treatment for ESRD. The conclusions that can be drawn from such considerations provide knowledge of value to both medical communities and policy makers throughout the world. Even at a national level, data collection and analysis requires extensive resources to enable fast and reliable reporting of the most recent numbers. The collection of records reflecting the situation in a large group of countries presents additional challenges that render timely reporting a difficult target to achieve. A multi-country European database is organized by the ERA/EDTA, and now consolidates renal replacement information from different renal registries collecting patient data of 27 countries [16]. An alternative approach to reporting international ESRD-relevant data is pursued in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). This was initiated in 2002 as an observational study and presently collects information on haemodialysis (HD) practice patterns and their associated outcomes from 12 countries in Europe, North America and Asia [15]. Fresenius Medical Care, the largest dialysis care company worldwide, follows two different and separate approaches, one addressing practice patterns and outcomes in its clinics (e.g. the European Clinical Database, EuClid), and the other using its extensive international network for retrieving and comparing reliable and contemporary ESRD demographic information from 122 countries [2,18]. This article supplies an extract of the latter for use and reference by renal care specialists and healthcare administrative bodies. In addition, trends observed in association with patient demographic data are specified and discussed. Details pertaining to the treatment of patients with ESRD were collected for 122 countries that have established dialysis programmes and to which the Fresenius Medical Care international dialysis network has insight. The individual countries are listed in Table 1. With a combined population of 5.9 billion, these countries represent 92% of the total world population. For practical reasons, some widely accepted special administrative areas or regions of special sovereignty are also termed countries throughout this article. Countries included in the survey Countries included in the survey The country-by-country surveys performed at the end of each calendar year focus on the total number of patients treated for ESRD, the treatment modality selected, products used, treatment location and ESRD patient care structure and funding. The survey has been refined over the years to facilitate access to more detailed information and to reflect changes in the development of therapies and products. Its modular design allows the information from all countries to be consolidated and compiled in one central database. The questionnaires are prepared in English and, in some cases, the relevant local language, and are distributed to professionals in the field of dialysis who are in a position to insert ESRD-relevant country-specific information themselves or who can coordinate appropriate input from knowledgeable contacts in each country. Country demographic and economic data are extracted from publicly available and intern
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetes: a 21st century challenge
Zimmet, P. Z., Magliano, D. J., Herman, W. H., & Shaw, J. E. (2014) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70112-8 · Cited by 1,062
Global epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease and disparities in kidney replacement therapy
Thurlow, J. S., Joshi, M., Yan, G., Norris, K. C., Agodoa, L. Y., Yuan, C. M., & Nee, R. (2021) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000514550 · Cited by 855
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis
Cooper, B. A., Branley, P., Bulfone, L., Collins, J. F., Craig, J. C., Fraenkel, M. B., Harris, A., Johnson, D. W., Kesselhut, J., Li, J. J., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1000552 · Cited by 854
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis
Palmer, S. C., Navaneethan, S. D., Craig, J. C., Johnson, D. W., Perkovic, V., Hegbrant, J., & Strippoli, G. F. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007784.pub2 · Cited by 331
Patient perceived quality of nursing care in hemodialysis: a meta-synthesis
Balouchi, A., Ebadi, A., Parvizy, S., & Sharif Nia, H. (2021) · Healthcare in Low-resource Settings · doi:10.4081/hls.2021.9320 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Grassmann, A., Gioberge, S., Moeller, S., & Brown, G.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2587-2593
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W2133595737
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/gfi159
- The paper
- Grassmann, A., Gioberge, S., Moeller, S., & Brown, G. (2005). ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfi159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.