Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 670

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents

Open access
Serruys, Patrick W., Silber, Sigmund, Garg, Scot, van Geuns, Robert Jan, Richardt, Gert, Buszman, Pawel E., Kelbæk, Henning, van Boven, Adrianus Johannes, Hofma, Sjoerd H., Linke, Axel, Klauss, Volker, Wijns, William, Macaya, Carlos, Garot, Philippe, DiMario, Carlo, Manoharan, Ganesh, Kornowski, Ran, Ischinger, Thomas, Bartorelli, Antonio, Ronden, Jacintha, Bressers, Marco, Gobbens, Pierre, Negoita, Manuela, van Leeuwen, Frank, Windecker, Stephan·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New-generation coronary stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in efficacy and safety between the two types of stents on the basis of prospectively adjudicated end points endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration. METHODS: In this multicenter, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 2292 patients to undergo treatment with coronary stents releasing either zotarolimus or everolimus. Twenty percent of patients were randomly selected for repeat angiography at 13 months. The primary end point was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction (not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel), or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization within 12 months. The secondary angiographic end point was the extent of in-stent stenosis at 13 months. RESULTS: At least one off-label criterion for stent placement was present in 66% of patients. The zotarolimus-eluting stent was noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent with respect to the primary end point, which occurred in 8.2% and 8.3% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.3% in the zotarolimus-stent group and 1.5% in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.17). The zotarolimus-eluting stent was also noninferior regarding the degree (+/-SD) of in-stent stenosis (21.65+/-14.42% for zotarolimus vs. 19.76+/-14.64% for everolimus, P=0.04 for noninferiority). In-stent late lumen loss was 0.27+/-0.43 mm in the zotarolimus-stent group versus 0.19+/-0.40 mm in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.08). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: At 13 months, the new-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent was found to be noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00617084.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1004130

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 670

Metadata

Authors
Serruys, P. W., Silber, S., Garg, S., van Geuns, R. J., Richardt, G., Buszman, P. E., Kelbæk, H., van Boven, A. J., Hofma, S. H., Linke, A., Klauss, V., Wijns, W., Macaya, C., Garot, P., DiMario, C., Manoharan, G., Kornowski, R., Ischinger, T., Bartorelli, A., Ronden, J., Bressers, M., Gobbens, P., Negoita, M., van Leeuwen, F., & Windecker, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-07-08
Volume
363
Issue
2
Pages
136-146
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2144552468
Cited by
670
References
1
FWCI
78.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1004130
The paper
Serruys, P. W., Silber, S., Garg, S., van Geuns, R. J., Richardt, G., Buszman, P. E., Kelbæk, H., van Boven, A. J., Hofma, S. H., Linke, A., Klauss, V., Wijns, W., Macaya, C., Garot, P., DiMario, C., Manoharan, G., Kornowski, R., Ischinger, T., Bartorelli, A., . . . Windecker, S. (2010). Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1004130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.