Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for Human Lung Stem Cells

Open access
Kajstura, Jan, Rota, Marcello, Hall, Sean R., Hosoda, Toru, D'Amario, Domenico, Sanada, Fumihiro, Zheng, Hanqiao, Ogórek, Barbara, Rondon-Clavo, Carlos, Ferreira-Martins, João, Matsuda, Alex, Arranto, Christian, Goichberg, Polina, Giordano, Giovanna, Haley, Kathleen J., Bardelli, Silvana, Rayatzadeh, Hussein, Liu, Xiaoli, Quaini, Federico, Liao, Ronglih, Leri, Annarosa, Perrella, Mark A., Loscalzo, Joseph, Anversa, Piero·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although progenitor cells have been described in distinct anatomical regions of the lung, description of resident stem cells has remained elusive. METHODS: Surgical lung-tissue specimens were studied in situ to identify and characterize human lung stem cells. We defined their phenotype and functional properties in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: Human lungs contain undifferentiated human lung stem cells nested in niches in the distal airways. These cells are self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent in vitro. After injection into damaged mouse lung in vivo, human lung stem cells form human bronchioles, alveoli, and pulmonary vessels integrated structurally and functionally with the damaged organ. The formation of a chimeric lung was confirmed by detection of human transcripts for epithelial and vascular genes. In addition, the self-renewal and long-term proliferation of human lung stem cells was shown in serial-transplantation assays. CONCLUSIONS: Human lungs contain identifiable stem cells. In animal models, these cells participate in tissue homeostasis and regeneration. They have the undemonstrated potential to promote tissue restoration in patients with lung disease. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1101324This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Kajstura, J., Rota, M., Hall, S. R., Hosoda, T., D'Amario, D., Sanada, F., Zheng, H., Ogórek, B., Rondon-Clavo, C., Ferreira-Martins, J., Matsuda, A., Arranto, C., Goichberg, P., Giordano, G., Haley, K. J., Bardelli, S., Rayatzadeh, H., Liu, X., Quaini, F., Liao, R., Leri, A., Perrella, M. A., Loscalzo, J., & Anversa, P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-05-12
Volume
364
Issue
19
Pages
1795-1806
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1974911818
Cited by
380
References
2
FWCI
55.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Human Lung Stem Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1101324
The paper
Kajstura, J., Rota, M., Hall, S. R., Hosoda, T., D'Amario, D., Sanada, F., Zheng, H., Ogórek, B., Rondon-Clavo, C., Ferreira-Martins, J., Matsuda, A., Arranto, C., Goichberg, P., Giordano, G., Haley, K. J., Bardelli, S., Rayatzadeh, H., Liu, X., Quaini, F., . . . Anversa, P. (2011). Evidence for Human Lung Stem Cells. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1101324

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.