Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 607

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ulipristal Acetate versus Leuprolide Acetate for Uterine Fibroids

Open access
Donnez, Jacques, Tomaszewski, Janusz, Vázquez, Francisco, Bouchard, Philippe, Lemieszczuk, Boguslav, Baró, Francesco, Nouri, Kazem, Selvaggi, Luigi, Sodowski, Krzysztof, Bestel, Elke, Terrill, Paul, Osterloh, Ian, Loumaye, Ernest·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and side-effect profile of ulipristal acetate as compared with those of leuprolide acetate for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids before surgery are unclear. METHODS: In this double-blind noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 307 patients with symptomatic fibroids and excessive uterine bleeding to receive 3 months of daily therapy with oral ulipristal acetate (at a dose of either 5 mg or 10 mg) or once-monthly intramuscular injections of leuprolide acetate (at a dose of 3.75 mg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with controlled bleeding at week 13, with a prespecified noninferiority margin of -20%. RESULTS: Uterine bleeding was controlled in 90% of patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, in 98% of those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and in 89% of those receiving leuprolide acetate, for differences (as compared with leuprolide acetate) of 1.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.3 to 11.8) for 5 mg of ulipristal acetate and 8.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4 to 18.3) for 10 mg of ulipristal acetate. Median times to amenorrhea were 7 days for patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, 5 days for those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and 21 days for those receiving leuprolide acetate. Moderate-to-severe hot flashes were reported for 11% of patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, for 10% of those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and for 40% of those receiving leuprolide acetate (P<0.001 for each dose of ulipristal acetate vs. leuprolide acetate). CONCLUSIONS: Both the 5-mg and 10-mg daily doses of ulipristal acetate were noninferior to once-monthly leuprolide acetate in controlling uterine bleeding and were significantly less likely to cause hot flashes. (Funded by PregLem; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00740831.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1103180

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 607

Metadata

Authors
Donnez, J., Tomaszewski, J., Vázquez, F., Bouchard, P., Lemieszczuk, B., Baró, F., Nouri, K., Selvaggi, L., Sodowski, K., Bestel, E., Terrill, P., Osterloh, I., & Loumaye, E.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-02-02
Volume
366
Issue
5
Pages
421-432
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2156957181
Cited by
607
References
2
FWCI
64.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ulipristal Acetate versus Leuprolide Acetate for Uterine Fibroids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1103180
The paper
Donnez, J., Tomaszewski, J., Vázquez, F., Bouchard, P., Lemieszczuk, B., Baró, F., Nouri, K., Selvaggi, L., Sodowski, K., Bestel, E., Terrill, P., Osterloh, I., & Loumaye, E. (2012). Ulipristal Acetate versus Leuprolide Acetate for Uterine Fibroids. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1103180

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.