Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 963

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second over Time in COPD

Open access
Vestbo, Jørgen, Edwards, Lisa D., Scanlon, Paul D., Yates, Julie C., Agusti, Alvar, Bakke, Per, Calverley, Peter M.A., Celli, Bartolome, Coxson, Harvey O., Crim, Courtney, Lomas, David A., MacNee, William, Miller, Bruce E., Silverman, Edwin K., Tal-Singer, Ruth, Wouters, Emiel, Rennard, Stephen I.·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A key feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an accelerated rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), but data on the variability and determinants of this change in patients who have established disease are scarce. METHODS: We analyzed the changes in FEV(1) after administration of a bronchodilator over a 3-year period in 2163 patients. A random-coefficient model was used to evaluate possible predictors of both FEV(1) levels and their changes over time. RESULTS: The mean (±SE) rate of change in FEV(1) was a decline of 33±2 ml per year, with significant variation among the patients studied. The between-patient standard deviation for the rate of decline was 59 ml per year. Over the 3-year study period, 38% of patients had an estimated decline in FEV(1) of more than 40 ml per year, 31% had a decline of 21 to 40 ml per year, 23% had a change in FEV(1) that ranged from a decrease of 20 ml per year to an increase of 20 ml per year, and 8% had an increase of more than 20 ml per year. The mean rate of decline in FEV(1) was 21±4 ml per year greater in current smokers than in current nonsmokers, 13±4 ml per year greater in patients with emphysema than in those without emphysema, and 17±4 ml per year greater in patients with bronchodilator reversibility than in those without reversibility. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of change in FEV(1) among patients with COPD is highly variable, with increased rates of decline among current smokers, patients with bronchodilator reversibility, and patients with emphysema.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1105482

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 963

Metadata

Authors
Vestbo, J., Edwards, L. D., Scanlon, P. D., Yates, J. C., Agusti, A., Bakke, P., Calverley, P. M. A., Celli, B., Coxson, H. O., Crim, C., Lomas, D. A., MacNee, W., Miller, B. E., Silverman, E. K., Tal-Singer, R., Wouters, E., & Rennard, S. I.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-09-29
Volume
365
Issue
13
Pages
1184-1192
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2171676943
Cited by
963
References
1
FWCI
61.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second over Time in COPD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1105482
The paper
Vestbo, J., Edwards, L. D., Scanlon, P. D., Yates, J. C., Agusti, A., Bakke, P., Calverley, P. M. A., Celli, B., Coxson, H. O., Crim, C., Lomas, D. A., MacNee, W., Miller, B. E., Silverman, E. K., Tal-Singer, R., Wouters, E., & Rennard, S. I. (2011). Changes in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second over Time in COPD. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1105482

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.