Bone-Density Testing Interval and Transition to Osteoporosis in Older Women
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although bone mineral density (BMD) testing to screen for osteoporosis (BMD T score, -2.50 or lower) is recommended for women 65 years of age or older, there are few data to guide decisions about the interval between BMD tests. METHODS: We studied 4957 women, 67 years of age or older, with normal BMD (T score at the femoral neck and total hip, -1.00 or higher) or osteopenia (T score, -1.01 to -2.49) and with no history of hip or clinical vertebral fracture or of treatment for osteoporosis, followed prospectively for up to 15 years. The BMD testing interval was defined as the estimated time for 10% of women to make the transition to osteoporosis before having a hip or clinical vertebral fracture, with adjustment for estrogen use and clinical risk factors. Transitions from normal BMD and from three subgroups of osteopenia (mild, moderate, and advanced) were analyzed with the use of parametric cumulative incidence models. Incident hip and clinical vertebral fractures and initiation of treatment with bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or raloxifene were treated as competing risks. RESULTS: The estimated BMD testing interval was 16.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5 to 24.6) for women with normal BMD, 17.3 years (95% CI, 13.9 to 21.5) for women with mild osteopenia, 4.7 years (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.2) for women with moderate osteopenia, and 1.1 years (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.3) for women with advanced osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that osteoporosis would develop in less than 10% of older, postmenopausal women during rescreening intervals of approximately 15 years for women with normal bone density or mild osteopenia, 5 years for women with moderate osteopenia, and 1 year for women with advanced osteopenia. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Normal BMD and mild osteopenia confer a very low risk for osteoporosis.
“because normal BMD and mild osteopenia confer a very low risk for osteoporosis (7)”
From Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications (2013) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290 · see citing works
Self-citationScreening for Osteoporosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00307 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [3]Lewiecki EM Gordon CM Baim S International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 adult and pediatric official positions Bone 2008 43 1115 21 18793764
- [4]Lim LS Hoeksema LJ Sherin K Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice Am J Prev Med 2009 36 366 75 19285200
- [5]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG practice bulletin no. 50 Washington, DC ACOG 2008
- [6]Management of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women: 2010 position statement of the North American Menopause Society Menopause 2010 17 25 54 20061894
- [7]American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition with selected updates for 2003 Endocr Pract 2003 9 544 64 14715483
- [8]Hillier TA Stone KL Bauer DC Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women Arch Intern Med 2007 167 155 60 17242316
- [9]Frost SA Nguyen ND Center JR Eisman JA Nguyen TV Timing of repeat BMD measurements: development of an absolute risk-based prognostic model J Bone Miner Res 2009 24 1800 7 19419321
- [10]Cummings SR Black DM Nevitt MC Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women JAMA 1990 263 665 8 2404146
- [11]Kanis JA Oden A Johansson H Borgström F Ström O McCloskey E FRAX and its applications to clinical practice Bone 2009 44 734 43 19195497
- [14]Fine JP Regression modeling of competing crude failure probabilities Biostatistics 2001 2 85 97 12933558
- [15]Klein J Moeschberger M Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data 2 New York Springer 2003
- [16]Lindsey JC Ryan LM Tutorial in biostatistics: methods for interval-censored data Stat Med 1998 17 219 38 [Erratum, Stat Med 1999;18:890.] 9483730
- [17]Jeong J Fine J Parametric regression on cumulative incidence function Biostatistics 2007 8 184 96 16636138
- [19]Lee M Fine J Inference for cumulative incidence quantiles via parametric and nonparametric approaches Stat Med 2011 27 3221 35 21898525
- [22]Esserman L Shieh Y Thompson I Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer JAMA 2009 302 1685 92 19843904
- [23]Partridge AH Winer EP On mammography — more agreement than disagreement N Engl J Med 2009 361 2499 501 19940286
- [24]Sawaya GF Cervical-cancer screening — new guidelines and the balance between benefits and harms N Engl J Med 2009 361 2503 5 19940285
- [25]Schwartz LM Woloshin S Fowler F Jr Welch HG Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States JAMA 2004 291 71 8 14709578
- [26]Greendale GA Espeland M Slone S Marcus R Barrett-Connor E Bone mass response to discontinuation of long-term hormone replacement therapy Arch Intern Med 2002 162 665 72 11911720
- [27]Cauley JA Seeley DG Ensrud K Ettinger B Black D Cummings SR Estrogen replacement therapy and fractures in older women Ann Intern Med 1995 122 9 16 7985914
- [28]Looker AC Melton LJ III Harris TB Borrud LG Shepherd JA Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005–2006 compared with NHANES III J Bone Miner Res 2010 25 64 71 19580459 PMC3312738
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Diab, D. L., Eldeiry, L. S., Farooki, A., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kelly, J., Lewiecki, E. M., et al. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/gl-2020-0524suppl · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Clarke, B. L., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kleerekoper, M., Lewiecki, E. M., Miller, P. D., Narula, H. S., et al. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161435.esgl · Cited by 1,140 · see citing works
Pickhardt, P. J., Pooler, B. D., Lauder, T., del Rio, A. M., Bruce, R. J., & Binkley, N. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003 · Cited by 954 · see citing works
Qaseem, A., Forciea, M. A., McLean, R. M., Denberg, T. D., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-1361 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Osteoporosis: current concepts
Akkawi, I., & Zmerly, H. (2018) · Joints · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1660790 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
The prevention of osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older adults
Coll, P. P., Phu, S., Hajjar, S. H., Kirk, B., Duque, G., & Taxel, P. (2021) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.17043 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Bae, I.-S., Kim, J. M., Cheong, J. H., Ryu, J. I., & Han, M.-H. (2019) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.102316 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gourlay, M. L., Fine, J. P., Preisser, J. S., May, R. C., Li, C., Lui, L.-Y., Ransohoff, D. F., Cauley, J. A., & Ensrud, K. E.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2012-01-19
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-233
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC3285114
- OpenAlex
- W2109273946
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 34.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG005394, AG05394, R01AG005407, R01AG027576, AG-05407, R01AG027574)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR035584, AR35583, AR-35584, AR 35582, R01AR035582, R01AR035583)
- National Center for Research Resources (K23RR024685)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
- Keywords
- osteoporosis screening, osteopenia, older women, postmenopausal women, hip fracture, vertebral fractures, bisphosphonates, raloxifene, calcitonin, estrogen therapy, cumulative incidence
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Osteoporosis, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Bone Density, Incidence, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Bone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review