Cited by 273Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsHip and Femur Fractures

Bone-Density Testing Interval and Transition to Osteoporosis in Older Women

Open access
Gourlay, Margaret L., Fine, Jason P., Preisser, John S., May, Ryan C., Li, Chenxi, Lui, Li-Yung, Ransohoff, David F., Cauley, Jane A. +1 more·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bone mineral density (BMD) testing to screen for osteoporosis (BMD T score, -2.50 or lower) is recommended for women 65 years of age or older, there are few data to guide decisions about the interval between BMD tests. METHODS: We studied 4957 women, 67 years of age or older, with normal BMD (T score at the femoral neck and total hip, -1.00 or higher) or osteopenia (T score, -1.01 to -2.49) and with no history of hip or clinical vertebral fracture or of treatment for osteoporosis, followed prospectively for up to 15 years. The BMD testing interval was defined as the estimated time for 10% of women to make the transition to osteoporosis before having a hip or clinical vertebral fracture, with adjustment for estrogen use and clinical risk factors. Transitions from normal BMD and from three subgroups of osteopenia (mild, moderate, and advanced) were analyzed with the use of parametric cumulative incidence models. Incident hip and clinical vertebral fractures and initiation of treatment with bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or raloxifene were treated as competing risks. RESULTS: The estimated BMD testing interval was 16.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5 to 24.6) for women with normal BMD, 17.3 years (95% CI, 13.9 to 21.5) for women with mild osteopenia, 4.7 years (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.2) for women with moderate osteopenia, and 1.1 years (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.3) for women with advanced osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that osteoporosis would develop in less than 10% of older, postmenopausal women during rescreening intervals of approximately 15 years for women with normal bone density or mild osteopenia, 5 years for women with moderate osteopenia, and 1 year for women with advanced osteopenia. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1107142

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [3]Lewiecki EM Gordon CM Baim S International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 adult and pediatric official positions Bone 2008 43 1115 21 18793764
  2. [4]Lim LS Hoeksema LJ Sherin K Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice Am J Prev Med 2009 36 366 75 19285200
  3. [5]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG practice bulletin no. 50 Washington, DC ACOG 2008
  4. [6]Management of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women: 2010 position statement of the North American Menopause Society Menopause 2010 17 25 54 20061894
  5. [7]American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition with selected updates for 2003 Endocr Pract 2003 9 544 64 14715483
  6. [8]Hillier TA Stone KL Bauer DC Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women Arch Intern Med 2007 167 155 60 17242316
  7. [9]Frost SA Nguyen ND Center JR Eisman JA Nguyen TV Timing of repeat BMD measurements: development of an absolute risk-based prognostic model J Bone Miner Res 2009 24 1800 7 19419321
  8. [10]Cummings SR Black DM Nevitt MC Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women JAMA 1990 263 665 8 2404146
  9. [11]Kanis JA Oden A Johansson H Borgström F Ström O McCloskey E FRAX and its applications to clinical practice Bone 2009 44 734 43 19195497
  10. [14]Fine JP Regression modeling of competing crude failure probabilities Biostatistics 2001 2 85 97 12933558
  11. [15]Klein J Moeschberger M Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data 2 New York Springer 2003
  12. [16]Lindsey JC Ryan LM Tutorial in biostatistics: methods for interval-censored data Stat Med 1998 17 219 38 [Erratum, Stat Med 1999;18:890.] 9483730
  13. [17]Jeong J Fine J Parametric regression on cumulative incidence function Biostatistics 2007 8 184 96 16636138
  14. [19]Lee M Fine J Inference for cumulative incidence quantiles via parametric and nonparametric approaches Stat Med 2011 27 3221 35 21898525
  15. [22]Esserman L Shieh Y Thompson I Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer JAMA 2009 302 1685 92 19843904
  16. [23]Partridge AH Winer EP On mammography — more agreement than disagreement N Engl J Med 2009 361 2499 501 19940286
  17. [24]Sawaya GF Cervical-cancer screening — new guidelines and the balance between benefits and harms N Engl J Med 2009 361 2503 5 19940285
  18. [25]Schwartz LM Woloshin S Fowler F Jr Welch HG Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States JAMA 2004 291 71 8 14709578
  19. [26]Greendale GA Espeland M Slone S Marcus R Barrett-Connor E Bone mass response to discontinuation of long-term hormone replacement therapy Arch Intern Med 2002 162 665 72 11911720
  20. [27]Cauley JA Seeley DG Ensrud K Ettinger B Black D Cummings SR Estrogen replacement therapy and fractures in older women Ann Intern Med 1995 122 9 16 7985914
  21. [28]Looker AC Melton LJ III Harris TB Borrud LG Shepherd JA Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005–2006 compared with NHANES III J Bone Miner Res 2010 25 64 71 19580459 PMC3312738

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gourlay, M. L., Fine, J. P., Preisser, J. S., May, R. C., Li, C., Lui, L.-Y., Ransohoff, D. F., Cauley, J. A., & Ensrud, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-01-19
Volume
366
Issue
3
Pages
225-233
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2109273946
Cited by
273
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 29
FWCI
34.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG005394, AG05394, R01AG005407, R01AG027576, AG-05407, R01AG027574)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR035584, AR35583, AR-35584, AR 35582, R01AR035582, R01AR035583)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K23RR024685)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
Keywords
osteoporosis screening, osteopenia, older women, postmenopausal women, hip fracture, vertebral fractures, bisphosphonates, raloxifene, calcitonin, estrogen therapy, cumulative incidence
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Osteoporosis, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Bone Density, Incidence, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review