Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,897

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rivaroxaban in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

Open access
Mega, Jessica L., Braunwald, Eugene, Wiviott, Stephen D., Bassand, Jean-Pierre, Bhatt, Deepak L., Bode, Christoph, Burton, Paul, Cohen, Marc, Cook-Bruns, Nancy, Fox, Keith A.A., Goto, Shinya, Murphy, Sabina A., Plotnikov, Alexei N., Schneider, David, Sun, Xiang, Verheugt, Freek W.A., Gibson, C. Michael·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndromes arise from coronary atherosclerosis with superimposed thrombosis. Since factor Xa plays a central role in thrombosis, the inhibition of factor Xa with low-dose rivaroxaban might improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 15,526 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome to receive twice-daily doses of either 2.5 mg or 5 mg of rivaroxaban or placebo for a mean of 13 months and up to 31 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary efficacy end point, as compared with placebo, with respective rates of 8.9% and 10.7% (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.96; P=0.008), with significant improvement for both the twice-daily 2.5-mg dose (9.1% vs. 10.7%, P=0.02) and the twice-daily 5-mg dose (8.8% vs. 10.7%, P=0.03). The twice-daily 2.5-mg dose of rivaroxaban reduced the rates of death from cardiovascular causes (2.7% vs. 4.1%, P=0.002) and from any cause (2.9% vs. 4.5%, P=0.002), a survival benefit that was not seen with the twice-daily 5-mg dose. As compared with placebo, rivaroxaban increased the rates of major bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting (2.1% vs. 0.6%, P<0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.6% vs. 0.2%, P=0.009), without a significant increase in fatal bleeding (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.66) or other adverse events. The twice-daily 2.5-mg dose resulted in fewer fatal bleeding events than the twice-daily 5-mg dose (0.1% vs. 0.4%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Rivaroxaban increased the risk of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage but not the risk of fatal bleeding. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer Healthcare; ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00809965.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1112277

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,897

Metadata

Authors
Mega, J. L., Braunwald, E., Wiviott, S. D., Bassand, J.-P., Bhatt, D. L., Bode, C., Burton, P., Cohen, M., Cook-Bruns, N., Fox, K. A. A., Goto, S., Murphy, S. A., Plotnikov, A. N., Schneider, D., Sun, X., Verheugt, F. W. A., & Gibson, C. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-01-05
Volume
366
Issue
1
Pages
9-19
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2117677020
Cited by
1,897
References
5
FWCI
115.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rivaroxaban in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1112277
The paper
Mega, J. L., Braunwald, E., Wiviott, S. D., Bassand, J.-P., Bhatt, D. L., Bode, C., Burton, P., Cohen, M., Cook-Bruns, N., Fox, K. A. A., Goto, S., Murphy, S. A., Plotnikov, A. N., Schneider, D., Sun, X., Verheugt, F. W. A., & Gibson, C. M. (2012). Rivaroxaban in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1112277

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.