Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 700

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oral Immunotherapy for Treatment of Egg Allergy in Children

Open access
Burks, A. Wesley, Jones, Stacie M., Wood, Robert A., Fleischer, David M., Sicherer, Scott H., Lindblad, Robert W., Stablein, Donald, Henning, Alice K., Vickery, Brian P., Liu, Andrew H., Scurlock, Amy M., Shreffler, Wayne G., Plaut, Marshall, Sampson, Hugh A.·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For egg allergy, dietary avoidance is the only currently approved treatment. We evaluated oral immunotherapy using egg-white powder for the treatment of children with egg allergy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 55 children, 5 to 11 years of age, with egg allergy received oral immunotherapy (40 children) or placebo (15). Initial dose-escalation, build-up, and maintenance phases were followed by an oral food challenge with egg-white powder at 10 months and at 22 months. Children who successfully passed the challenge at 22 months discontinued oral immunotherapy and avoided all egg consumption for 4 to 6 weeks. At 24 months, these children underwent an oral food challenge with egg-white powder and a cooked egg to test for sustained unresponsiveness. Children who passed this challenge at 24 months were placed on a diet with ad libitum egg consumption and were evaluated for continuation of sustained unresponsiveness at 30 months and 36 months. RESULTS: After 10 months of therapy, none of the children who received placebo and 55% of those who received oral immunotherapy passed the oral food challenge and were considered to be desensitized; after 22 months, 75% of children in the oral-immunotherapy group were desensitized. In the oral-immunotherapy group, 28% (11 of 40 children) passed the oral food challenge at 24 months and were considered to have sustained unresponsiveness. At 30 months and 36 months, all children who had passed the oral food challenge at 24 months were consuming egg. Of the immune markers measured, small wheal diameters on skin-prick testing and increases in egg-specific IgG4 antibody levels were associated with passing the oral food challenge at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that oral immunotherapy can desensitize a high proportion of children with egg allergy and induce sustained unresponsiveness in a clinically significant subset. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00461097.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1200435

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Burks, A. W., Jones, S. M., Wood, R. A., Fleischer, D. M., Sicherer, S. H., Lindblad, R. W., Stablein, D., Henning, A. K., Vickery, B. P., Liu, A. H., Scurlock, A. M., Shreffler, W. G., Plaut, M., & Sampson, H. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
367
Issue
3
Pages
233-243
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2162344297
Cited by
700
References
2
FWCI
42.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Immunotherapy for Treatment of Egg Allergy in Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1200435
The paper
Burks, A. W., Jones, S. M., Wood, R. A., Fleischer, D. M., Sicherer, S. H., Lindblad, R. W., Stablein, D., Henning, A. K., Vickery, B. P., Liu, A. H., Scurlock, A. M., Shreffler, W. G., Plaut, M., & Sampson, H. A. (2012). Oral Immunotherapy for Treatment of Egg Allergy in Children. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1200435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.