Cited by 360Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesActinomycetales infections and treatment

Necrotizing Cutaneous Mucormycosis after a Tornado in Joplin, Missouri, in 2011

Open access
Neblett Fanfair, Robyn, Benedict, Kaitlin, Bos, John, Bennett, Sarah D., Lo, Yi-Chun, Adebanjo, Tolu, Etienne, Kizee, Deak, Eszter +15 more·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mucormycosis is a fungal infection caused by environmentally acquired molds. We investigated a cluster of cases of cutaneous mucormycosis among persons injured during the May 22, 2011, tornado in Joplin, Missouri. METHODS: We defined a case as a soft-tissue infection in a person injured during the tornado, with evidence of a mucormycete on culture or immunohistochemical testing plus DNA sequencing. We conducted a case-control study by reviewing medical records and conducting interviews with case patients and hospitalized controls. DNA sequencing and whole-genome sequencing were performed on clinical specimens to identify species and assess strain-level differences, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 13 case patients were identified, 5 of whom (38%) died. The patients had a median of 5 wounds (range, 1 to 7); 11 patients (85%) had at least one fracture, 9 (69%) had blunt trauma, and 5 (38%) had penetrating trauma. All case patients had been located in the zone that sustained the most severe damage during the tornado. On multivariate analysis, infection was associated with penetrating trauma (adjusted odds ratio for case patients vs. controls, 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 69.2) and an increased number of wounds (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 for each additional wound; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.2). Sequencing of the D1-D2 region of the 28S ribosomal DNA yielded Apophysomyces trapeziformis in all 13 case patients. Whole-genome sequencing showed that the apophysomyces isolates were four separate strains. CONCLUSIONS: We report a cluster of cases of cutaneous mucormycosis among Joplin tornado survivors that were associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Increased awareness of fungi as a cause of necrotizing soft-tissue infections after a natural disaster is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1204781

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outbreaks of mucormycosis outside India are often associated with natural disasters and primarily affect socially disadvantaged populations living in affected areas.

    “Outbreaks of mucormycosis outside of India are often associated with natural disasters [90] such as hurricanes [91,92], tsunamis [91], or floodings [93], primarily affecting socially disadvantaged populations living in affected areas.”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [92]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Balajee SA, de Valk HA, Lasker BA, Meis JF, Klaassen CH. Utility of a micro- satellite assay for identifying clonally relat- ed outbreak isolates of Aspergillus fumig- atus. J Microbiol Methods 2008;73:252-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neblett Fanfair, R., Benedict, K., Bos, J., Bennett, S. D., Lo, Y.-C., Adebanjo, T., Etienne, K., Deak, E., Derado, G., Shieh, W.-J., Drew, C., Zaki, S., Sugerman, D., Gade, L., Thompson, E. H., Sutton, D. A., Engelthaler, D. M., Schupp, J. M., Brandt, M. E., Harris, J. R., Lockhart, S. R., Turabelidze, G., & Park, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-12-06
Volume
367
Issue
23
Pages
2214-2225
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2163430123
Cited by
360
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 2
FWCI
19.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
tornado injuries, penetrating trauma, wound infection, whole genome sequencing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Dermatomycoses, Disasters, DNA, Fungal, DNA, Ribosomal, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Missouri, Mucorales, Mucormycosis, Risk Factors, Skin, Wounds and Injuries, Case-Control Studies, Soft Tissue Infections, Fasciitis, Necrotizing, Young Adult, Tornadoes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review