The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The National Lung Screening Trial was conducted to determine whether three annual screenings (rounds T0, T1, and T2) with low-dose helical computed tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung cancer. We present detailed findings from the first two incidence screenings (rounds T1 and T2). METHODS: We evaluated the rate of adherence of the participants to the screening protocol, the results of screening and downstream diagnostic tests, features of the lung-cancer cases, and first-line treatments, and we estimated the performance characteristics of both screening methods. RESULTS: At the T1 and T2 rounds, positive screening results were observed in 27.9% and 16.8% of participants in the low-dose CT group and in 6.2% and 5.0% of participants in the radiography group, respectively. In the low-dose CT group, the sensitivity was 94.4%, the specificity was 72.6%, the positive predictive value was 2.4%, and the negative predictive value was 99.9% at T1; at T2, the positive predictive value increased to 5.2%. In the radiography group, the sensitivity was 59.6%, the specificity was 94.1%, the positive predictive value was 4.4%, and the negative predictive value was 99.8% at T1; both the sensitivity and the positive predictive value increased at T2. Among lung cancers of known stage, 87 (47.5%) were stage IA and 57 (31.1%) were stage III or IV in the low-dose CT group at T1; in the radiography group, 31 (23.5%) were stage IA and 78 (59.1%) were stage III or IV at T1. These differences in stage distribution between groups persisted at T2. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT was more sensitive in detecting early-stage lung cancers, but its measured positive predictive value was lower than that of radiography. As compared with radiography, the two annual incidence screenings with low-dose CT resulted in a decrease in the number of advanced-stage cancers diagnosed and an increase in the number of early-stage lung cancers diagnosed. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; NLST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350
Cited by
Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Retrospective Assessment
Pinsky, P. F., Gierada, D. S., Black, W., Munden, R., Nath, H., Aberle, D., & Kazerooni, E. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2086 · Cited by 508
Self-citationNCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2020
Motzer, R. J., Jonasch, E., Michaelson, M. D., Nandagopal, L., Gore, J. L., George, S., Alva, A., Haas, N., Harrison, M. R., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054 · Cited by 287
Scafoglio, C. R., Villegas, B., Abdelhady, G., Bailey, S. T., Liu, J., Shirali, A. S., Wallace, W. D., Magyar, C. E., Grogan, T. R., Elashoff, D., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5933 · Cited by 176
Self-citationNam, J. G., Hwang, E. J., Kim, J., Park, N., Lee, E. H., Kim, H. J., Nam, M., Lee, J. H., Park, C. M., & Goo, J. M. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.221894 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Aberle, D. R., DeMello, S., Berg, C. D., Black, W. C., Brewer, B., Church, T. R., Clingan, K. L., Duan, F., Fagerstrom, R. M., Gareen, I. F., Gatsonis, C. A., Gierada, D. S., Jain, A., Jones, G. C., Mahon, I., Marcus, P. M., Rathmell, J. M., & Sicks, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2013-09-05
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 920-931
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2152474505
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1208962
- The paper
- Aberle, D. R., DeMello, S., Berg, C. D., Black, W. C., Brewer, B., Church, T. R., Clingan, K. L., Duan, F., Fagerstrom, R. M., Gareen, I. F., Gatsonis, C. A., Gierada, D. S., Jain, A., Jones, G. C., Mahon, I., Marcus, P. M., Rathmell, J. M., & Sicks, J. (2013). Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1208962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.