Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probability of Cancer in Pulmonary Nodules Detected on First Screening CT

Open access
McWilliams, Annette, Tammemagi, Martin C., Mayo, John R., Roberts, Heidi, Liu, Geoffrey, Soghrati, Kam, Yasufuku, Kazuhiro, Martel, Simon, Laberge, Francis, Gingras, Michel, Atkar-Khattra, Sukhinder, Berg, Christine D., Evans, Ken, Finley, Richard, Yee, John, English, John, Nasute, Paola, Goffin, John, Puksa, Serge, Stewart, Lori, Tsai, Scott, Johnston, Michael R., Manos, Daria, Nicholas, Garth, Goss, Glenwood D., Seely, Jean M., Amjadi, Kayvan, Tremblay, Alain, Burrowes, Paul, MacEachern, Paul, Bhatia, Rick, Tsao, Ming-Sound, Lam, Stephen·2013·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major issues in the implementation of screening for lung cancer by means of low-dose computed tomography (CT) are the definition of a positive result and the management of lung nodules detected on the scans. We conducted a population-based prospective study to determine factors predicting the probability that lung nodules detected on the first screening low-dose CT scans are malignant or will be found to be malignant on follow-up. METHODS: We analyzed data from two cohorts of participants undergoing low-dose CT screening. The development data set included participants in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (PanCan). The validation data set included participants involved in chemoprevention trials at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), sponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute. The final outcomes of all nodules of any size that were detected on baseline low-dose CT scans were tracked. Parsimonious and fuller multivariable logistic-regression models were prepared to estimate the probability of lung cancer. RESULTS: In the PanCan data set, 1871 persons had 7008 nodules, of which 102 were malignant, and in the BCCA data set, 1090 persons had 5021 nodules, of which 42 were malignant. Among persons with nodules, the rates of cancer in the two data sets were 5.5% and 3.7%, respectively. Predictors of cancer in the model included older age, female sex, family history of lung cancer, emphysema, larger nodule size, location of the nodule in the upper lobe, part-solid nodule type, lower nodule count, and spiculation. Our final parsimonious and full models showed excellent discrimination and calibration, with areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of more than 0.90, even for nodules that were 10 mm or smaller in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive tools based on patient and nodule characteristics can be used to accurately estimate the probability that lung nodules detected on baseline screening low-dose CT scans are malignant. (Funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00751660.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1214726

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,414

Metadata

Authors
McWilliams, A., Tammemagi, M. C., Mayo, J. R., Roberts, H., Liu, G., Soghrati, K., Yasufuku, K., Martel, S., Laberge, F., Gingras, M., Atkar-Khattra, S., Berg, C. D., Evans, K., Finley, R., Yee, J., English, J., Nasute, P., Goffin, J., Puksa, S., Stewart, L., Tsai, S., Johnston, M. R., Manos, D., Nicholas, G., Goss, G. D., Seely, J. M., Amjadi, K., Tremblay, A., Burrowes, P., MacEachern, P., Bhatia, R., Tsao, M.-S., & Lam, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
369
Issue
10
Pages
910-919
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2114175038
Cited by
1,414
References
1
FWCI
52.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probability of Cancer in Pulmonary Nodules Detected on First Screening CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1214726
The paper
McWilliams, A., Tammemagi, M. C., Mayo, J. R., Roberts, H., Liu, G., Soghrati, K., Yasufuku, K., Martel, S., Laberge, F., Gingras, M., Atkar-Khattra, S., Berg, C. D., Evans, K., Finley, R., Yee, J., English, J., Nasute, P., Goffin, J., Puksa, S., . . . Lam, S. (2013). Probability of Cancer in Pulmonary Nodules Detected on First Screening CT. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1214726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.