Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European position statement on lung cancer screening

Open access
Oudkerk, Matthijs, Devaraj, Anand, Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn, Henzler, Thomas, Prosch, Helmut, Heussel, Claus P, Bastarrika, Gorka, Sverzellati, Nicola, Mascalchi, Mario, Delorme, Stefan, Baldwin, David R, Callister, Matthew E, Becker, Nikolaus, Heuvelmans, Marjolein A, Rzyman, Witold, Infante, Maurizio V, Pastorino, Ugo, Pedersen, Jesper H, Paci, Eugenio, Duffy, Stephen W, de Koning, Harry, Field, John K·2017·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT can save lives. This European Union (EU) position statement presents the available evidence and the major issues that need to be addressed to ensure the successful implementation of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Europe. This statement identified specific actions required by the European lung cancer screening community to adopt before the implementation of low-dose CT lung cancer screening. This position statement recommends the following actions: a risk stratification approach should be used for future lung cancer low-dose CT programmes; that individuals who enter screening programmes should be provided with information on the benefits and harms of screening, and smoking cessation should be offered to all current smokers; that management of detected solid nodules should use semi-automatically measured volume and volume-doubling time; that national quality assurance boards should be set up to oversee technical standards; that a lung nodule management pathway should be established and incorporated into clinical practice with a tailored screening approach; that non-calcified baseline lung nodules greater than 300 mm3, and new lung nodules greater than 200 mm3, should be managed in multidisciplinary teams according to this EU position statement recommendations to ensure that patients receive the most appropriate treatment; and planning for implementation of low-dose CT screening should start throughout Europe as soon as possible. European countries need to set a timeline for implementing lung cancer screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30861-6

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Oudkerk, M., Devaraj, A., Vliegenthart, R., Henzler, T., Prosch, H., Heussel, C. P., Bastarrika, G., Sverzellati, N., Mascalchi, M., Delorme, S., Baldwin, D. R., Callister, M. E., Becker, N., Heuvelmans, M. A., Rzyman, W., Infante, M. V., Pastorino, U., Pedersen, J. H., Paci, E., Duffy, S. W., de Koning, H., & Field, J. K.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
e754-e766
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771064131
Cited by
587
References
70
FWCI
47.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European position statement on lung cancer screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30861-6
The paper
Oudkerk, M., Devaraj, A., Vliegenthart, R., Henzler, T., Prosch, H., Heussel, C. P., Bastarrika, G., Sverzellati, N., Mascalchi, M., Delorme, S., Baldwin, D. R., Callister, M. E., Becker, N., Heuvelmans, M. A., Rzyman, W., Infante, M. V., Pastorino, U., Pedersen, J. H., Paci, E., . . . Field, J. K. (2017). European position statement on lung cancer screening. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30861-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.