Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,484

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Final Trial Report of Sentinel-Node Biopsy versus Nodal Observation in Melanoma

Open access
Morton, Donald L., Thompson, John F., Cochran, Alistair J., Mozzillo, Nicola, Nieweg, Omgo E., Roses, Daniel F., Hoekstra, Harold J., Karakousis, Constantine P., Puleo, Christopher A., Coventry, Brendon J., Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed, Smithers, B. Mark, Paul, Eberhard, Kraybill, William G., McKinnon, J. Gregory, Wang, He-Jing, Elashoff, Robert, Faries, Mark B.·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel-node biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure for regional melanoma staging, was evaluated in a phase 3 trial. METHODS: We evaluated outcomes in 2001 patients with primary cutaneous melanomas randomly assigned to undergo wide excision and nodal observation, with lymphadenectomy for nodal relapse (observation group), or wide excision and sentinel-node biopsy, with immediate lymphadenectomy for nodal metastases detected on biopsy (biopsy group). Results No significant treatment-related difference in the 10-year melanoma-specific survival rate was seen in the overall study population (20.8% with and 79.2% without nodal metastases). Mean (± SE) 10-year disease-free survival rates were significantly improved in the biopsy group, as compared with the observation group, among patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas, defined as 1.20 to 3.50 mm (71.3 ± 1.8% vs. 64.7 ± 2.3%; hazard ratio for recurrence or metastasis, 0.76; P=0.01), and those with thick melanomas, defined as >3.50 mm (50.7 ± 4.0% vs. 40.5 ± 4.7%; hazard ratio, 0.70; P=0.03). Among patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas, the 10-year melanoma-specific survival rate was 62.1 ± 4.8% among those with metastasis versus 85.1 ± 1.5% for those without metastasis (hazard ratio for death from melanoma, 3.09; P<0.001); among patients with thick melanomas, the respective rates were 48.0 ± 7.0% and 64.6 ± 4.9% (hazard ratio, 1.75; P=0.03). Biopsy-based management improved the 10-year rate of distant disease-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis, 0.62; P=0.02) and the 10-year rate of melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio for death from melanoma, 0.56; P=0.006) for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas and nodal metastases. Accelerated-failure-time latent-subgroup analysis was performed to account for the fact that nodal status was initially known only in the biopsy group, and a significant treatment benefit persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy-based staging of intermediate-thickness or thick primary melanomas provides important prognostic information and identifies patients with nodal metastases who may benefit from immediate complete lymphadenectomy. Biopsy-based management prolongs disease-free survival for all patients and prolongs distant disease-free survival and melanoma-specific survival for patients with nodal metastases from intermediate-thickness melanomas. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00275496.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1310460

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,484

Metadata

Authors
Morton, D. L., Thompson, J. F., Cochran, A. J., Mozzillo, N., Nieweg, O. E., Roses, D. F., Hoekstra, H. J., Karakousis, C. P., Puleo, C. A., Coventry, B. J., Kashani-Sabet, M., Smithers, B. M., Paul, E., Kraybill, W. G., McKinnon, J. G., Wang, H.-J., Elashoff, R., & Faries, M. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-02-13
Volume
370
Issue
7
Pages
599-609
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2145956339
Cited by
1,484
References
0
FWCI
67.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Final Trial Report of Sentinel-Node Biopsy versus Nodal Observation in Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1310460
The paper
Morton, D. L., Thompson, J. F., Cochran, A. J., Mozzillo, N., Nieweg, O. E., Roses, D. F., Hoekstra, H. J., Karakousis, C. P., Puleo, C. A., Coventry, B. J., Kashani-Sabet, M., Smithers, B. M., Paul, E., Kraybill, W. G., McKinnon, J. G., Wang, H.-J., Elashoff, R., & Faries, M. B. (2014). Final Trial Report of Sentinel-Node Biopsy versus Nodal Observation in Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1310460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.