The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CDX2 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background The identification of high-risk stage II colon cancers is key to the selection of patients who require adjuvant treatment after surgery. Microarray-based multigene-expression signatures derived from stem cells and progenitor cells hold promise, but they are difficult to use in clinical practice. Methods We used a new bioinformatics approach to search for biomarkers of colon epithelial differentiation across gene-expression arrays and then ranked candidate genes according to the availability of clinical-grade diagnostic assays. With the use of subgroup analysis involving independent and retrospective cohorts of patients with stage II or stage III colon cancer, the top candidate gene was tested for its association with disease-free survival and a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Results The transcription factor CDX2 ranked first in our screening test. A group of 87 of 2115 tumor samples (4.1%) lacked CDX2 expression. In the discovery data set, which included 466 patients, the rate of 5-year disease-free survival was lower among the 32 patients (6.9%) with CDX2-negative colon cancers than among the 434 (93.1%) with CDX2-positive colon cancers (hazard ratio for disease recurrence, 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 7.38; P=0.002). In the validation data set, which included 314 patients, the rate of 5-year disease-free survival was lower among the 38 patients (12.1%) with CDX2 protein-negative colon cancers than among the 276 (87.9%) with CDX2 protein-positive colon cancers (hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.36 to 4.29; P=0.003). In both these groups, these findings were independent of the patient's age, sex, and tumor stage and grade. Among patients with stage II cancer, the difference in 5-year disease-free survival was significant both in the discovery data set (49% among 15 patients with CDX2-negative tumors vs. 87% among 191 patients with CDX2-positive tumors, P=0.003) and in the validation data set (51% among 15 patients with CDX2-negative tumors vs. 80% among 106 patients with CDX2-positive tumors, P=0.004). In a pooled database of all patient cohorts, the rate of 5-year disease-free survival was higher among 23 patients with stage II CDX2-negative tumors who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy than among 25 who were not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (91% vs. 56%, P=0.006). Conclusions Lack of CDX2 expression identified a subgroup of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer who appeared to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the National Institutes of Health, and others.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Adjuvant Treatment for Colon Cancer
André, T., Boni, C., Mounedji-Boudiaf, L., Navarro, M., Tabernero, J., Hickish, T., Topham, C., Zaninelli, M., Clingan, P., Bridgewater, J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032709 · Cited by 3,689
Irinotecan plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Saltz, L. B., Cox, J. V., Blanke, C., Rosen, L. S., Fehrenbacher, L., Moore, M. J., Maroun, J. A., Ackland, S. P., Locker, P. K., Pirotta, N., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200009283431302 · Cited by 3,005
Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells
Dalerba, P., Dylla, S. J., Park, I.-K., Liu, R., Wang, X., Cho, R. W., Hoey, T., Gurney, A., Huang, E. H., Simeone, D. M., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703478104 · Cited by 2,184
Self-citationSystemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer
Meyerhardt, J. A., & Mayer, R. J. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra040958 · Cited by 1,043
Gill, S., Loprinzi, C. L., Sargent, D. J., Thomé, S. D., Alberts, S. R., Haller, D. G., Benedetti, J., Francini, G., Shepherd, L. E., Francois Seitz, J., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.09.059 · Cited by 1,021
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., McShane, L. M., Sauerbrei, W., & Taube, S. E. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001216 · Cited by 1,013
The Prognostic Role of a Gene Signature from Tumorigenic Breast-Cancer Cells
Liu, R., Wang, X., Chen, G. Y., Dalerba, P., Gurney, A., Hoey, T., Sherlock, G., Lewicki, J., Shedden, K., & Clarke, M. F. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa063994 · Cited by 985
Self-citationMerlos-Suárez, A., Barriga, F. M., Jung, P., Iglesias, M., Céspedes, M. V., Rossell, D., Sevillano, M., Hernando-Momblona, X., da Silva-Diz, V., Muñoz, P., et al. (2011) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.02.020 · Cited by 934
Systemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer
Varghese, A. M. (2019) · DeckerMed CGSO Case-Based Reviews · doi:10.2310/cgso.16189 · Cited by 883
De Sousa E Melo, F., Wang, X., Jansen, M., Fessler, E., Trinh, A., de Rooij, L. P. M. H., de Jong, J. H., de Boer, O. J., van Leersum, R., Bijlsma, M. F., et al. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3174 · Cited by 771
Cited by
Dekker, E., Tanis, P. J., Vleugels, J. L. A., Kasi, P. M., & Wallace, M. B. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32319-0 · Cited by 4,974
From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer
Punt, C. J. A., Koopman, M., & Vermeulen, L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.171 · Cited by 654
Longo, D. L., & Drazen, J. M. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme1516564 · Cited by 419
Clinical and Therapeutic Implications of Cancer Stem Cells
Clarke, M. F. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1804280 · Cited by 355
Self-citationBiomarker-guided therapy for colorectal cancer: strength in complexity
Sveen, A., Kopetz, S., & Lothe, R. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0241-1 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Dalerba, P., Sahoo, D., Paik, S., Guo, X., Yothers, G., Song, N., Wilcox-Fogel, N., Forgó, E., Rajendran, P. S., Miranda, S. P., Hisamori, S., Hutchison, J., Kalisky, T., Qian, D., Wolmark, N., Fisher, G. A., van de Rijn, M., & Clarke, M. F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-01-21
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-222
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2301536592
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 32.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CDX2 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1506597
- The paper
- Dalerba, P., Sahoo, D., Paik, S., Guo, X., Yothers, G., Song, N., Wilcox-Fogel, N., Forgó, E., Rajendran, P. S., Miranda, S. P., Hisamori, S., Hutchison, J., Kalisky, T., Qian, D., Wolmark, N., Fisher, G. A., van de Rijn, M., & Clarke, M. F. (2016). CDX2 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1506597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.