Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Trial of Factor VIII and Neutralizing Antibodies in Hemophilia A

Open access
Peyvandi, Flora, Mannucci, Pier M., Garagiola, Isabella, El-Beshlawy, Amal, Elalfy, Mohsen, Ramanan, Vijay, Eshghi, Peyman, Hanagavadi, Suresh, Varadarajan, Ramabadran, Karimi, Mehran, Manglani, Mamta V., Ross, Cecil, Young, Guy, Seth, Tulika, Apte, Shashikant, Nayak, Dinesh M., Santagostino, Elena, Mancuso, Maria Elisa, Sandoval Gonzalez, Adriana C., Mahlangu, Johnny N., Bonanad Boix, Santiago, Cerqueira, Monica, Ewing, Nadia P., Male, Christoph, Owaidah, Tarek, Soto Arellano, Veronica, Kobrinsky, Nathan L., Majumdar, Suvankar, Perez Garrido, Rosario, Sachdeva, Anupam, Simpson, Mindy, Thomas, Mathew, Zanon, Ezio, Antmen, Bulent, Kavakli, Kaan, Manco-Johnson, Marilyn J., Martinez, Monica, Marzouka, Esperanza, Mazzucconi, Maria G., Neme, Daniela, Palomo Bravo, Angeles, Paredes Aguilera, Rogelio, Prezotti, Alessandra, Schmitt, Klaus, Wicklund, Brian M., Zulfikar, Bulent, Rosendaal, Frits R.·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of neutralizing anti-factor VIII alloantibodies (inhibitors) in patients with severe hemophilia A may depend on the concentrate used for replacement therapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial to assess the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors among patients treated with plasma-derived factor VIII containing von Willebrand factor or recombinant factor VIII. Patients who met the eligibility criteria (male sex, age <6 years, severe hemophilia A, and no previous treatment with any factor VIII concentrate or only minimal treatment with blood components) were included from 42 sites. RESULTS: Of 303 patients screened, 264 underwent randomization and 251 were analyzed. Inhibitors developed in 76 patients, 50 of whom had high-titer inhibitors (≥5 Bethesda units). Inhibitors developed in 29 of the 125 patients treated with plasma-derived factor VIII (20 patients had high-titer inhibitors) and in 47 of the 126 patients treated with recombinant factor VIII (30 patients had high-titer inhibitors). The cumulative incidence of all inhibitors was 26.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.4 to 35.2) with plasma-derived factor VIII and 44.5% (95% CI, 34.7 to 54.3) with recombinant factor VIII; the cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitors was 18.6% (95% CI, 11.2 to 26.0) and 28.4% (95% CI, 19.6 to 37.2), respectively. In Cox regression models for the primary end point of all inhibitors, recombinant factor VIII was associated with an 87% higher incidence than plasma-derived factor VIII (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.96). This association did not change in multivariable analysis. For high-titer inhibitors, the hazard ratio was 1.69 (95% CI, 0.96 to 2.98). When the analysis was restricted to recombinant factor VIII products other than second-generation full-length recombinant factor VIII, effect estimates remained similar for all inhibitors (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.99 to 3.97) and high-titer inhibitors (hazard ratio, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.11 to 6.00). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with plasma-derived factor VIII containing von Willebrand factor had a lower incidence of inhibitors than those treated with recombinant factor VIII. (Funded by the Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01064284; EudraCT number, 2009-011186-88.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1516437

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 494

Metadata

Authors
Peyvandi, F., Mannucci, P. M., Garagiola, I., El-Beshlawy, A., Elalfy, M., Ramanan, V., Eshghi, P., Hanagavadi, S., Varadarajan, R., Karimi, M., Manglani, M. V., Ross, C., Young, G., Seth, T., Apte, S., Nayak, D. M., Santagostino, E., Mancuso, M. E., Sandoval Gonzalez, A. C., Mahlangu, J. N., Bonanad Boix, S., Cerqueira, M., Ewing, N. P., Male, C., Owaidah, T., Soto Arellano, V., Kobrinsky, N. L., Majumdar, S., Perez Garrido, R., Sachdeva, A., Simpson, M., Thomas, M., Zanon, E., Antmen, B., Kavakli, K., Manco-Johnson, M. J., Martinez, M., Marzouka, E., Mazzucconi, M. G., Neme, D., Palomo Bravo, A., Paredes Aguilera, R., Prezotti, A., Schmitt, K., Wicklund, B. M., Zulfikar, B., & Rosendaal, F. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-05-26
Volume
374
Issue
21
Pages
2054-2064
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2401865216
Cited by
494
References
22
FWCI
58.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of Factor VIII and Neutralizing Antibodies in Hemophilia A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1516437
The paper
Peyvandi, F., Mannucci, P. M., Garagiola, I., El-Beshlawy, A., Elalfy, M., Ramanan, V., Eshghi, P., Hanagavadi, S., Varadarajan, R., Karimi, M., Manglani, M. V., Ross, C., Young, G., Seth, T., Apte, S., Nayak, D. M., Santagostino, E., Mancuso, M. E., Sandoval Gonzalez, A. C., . . . Rosendaal, F. R. (2016). A Randomized Trial of Factor VIII and Neutralizing Antibodies in Hemophilia A. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1516437

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.