Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,994

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Open access
Cardoso, Fatima, van’t Veer, Laura J., Bogaerts, Jan, Slaets, Leen, Viale, Giuseppe, Delaloge, Suzette, Pierga, Jean-Yves, Brain, Etienne, Causeret, Sylvain, DeLorenzi, Mauro, Glas, Annuska M., Golfinopoulos, Vassilis, Goulioti, Theodora, Knox, Susan, Matos, Erika, Meulemans, Bart, Neijenhuis, Peter A., Nitz, Ulrike, Passalacqua, Rodolfo, Ravdin, Peter, Rubio, Isabel T., Saghatchian, Mahasti, Smilde, Tineke J., Sotiriou, Christos, Stork, Lisette, Straehle, Carolyn, Thomas, Geraldine, Thompson, Alastair M., van der Hoeven, Jacobus M., Vuylsteke, Peter, Bernards, René, Tryfonidis, Konstantinos, Rutgers, Emiel, Piccart, Martine·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 70-gene signature test (MammaPrint) has been shown to improve prediction of clinical outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer. We sought to provide prospective evidence of the clinical utility of the addition of the 70-gene signature to standard clinical-pathological criteria in selecting patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: In this randomized, phase 3 study, we enrolled 6693 women with early-stage breast cancer and determined their genomic risk (using the 70-gene signature) and their clinical risk (using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online). Women at low clinical and genomic risk did not receive chemotherapy, whereas those at high clinical and genomic risk did receive such therapy. In patients with discordant risk results, either the genomic risk or the clinical risk was used to determine the use of chemotherapy. The primary goal was to assess whether, among patients with high-risk clinical features and a low-risk gene-expression profile who did not receive chemotherapy, the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the rate of 5-year survival without distant metastasis would be 92% (i.e., the noninferiority boundary) or higher. RESULTS: A total of 1550 patients (23.2%) were deemed to be at high clinical risk and low genomic risk. At 5 years, the rate of survival without distant metastasis in this group was 94.7% (95% confidence interval, 92.5 to 96.2) among those not receiving chemotherapy. The absolute difference in this survival rate between these patients and those who received chemotherapy was 1.5 percentage points, with the rate being lower without chemotherapy. Similar rates of survival without distant metastasis were reported in the subgroup of patients who had estrogen-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and either node-negative or node-positive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with early-stage breast cancer who were at high clinical risk and low genomic risk for recurrence, the receipt of no chemotherapy on the basis of the 70-gene signature led to a 5-year rate of survival without distant metastasis that was 1.5 percentage points lower than the rate with chemotherapy. Given these findings, approximately 46% of women with breast cancer who are at high clinical risk might not require chemotherapy. (Funded by the European Commission Sixth Framework Program and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433589; EudraCT number, 2005-002625-31.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1602253

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,994

Metadata

Authors
Cardoso, F., van’t Veer, L. J., Bogaerts, J., Slaets, L., Viale, G., Delaloge, S., Pierga, J.-Y., Brain, E., Causeret, S., DeLorenzi, M., Glas, A. M., Golfinopoulos, V., Goulioti, T., Knox, S., Matos, E., Meulemans, B., Neijenhuis, P. A., Nitz, U., Passalacqua, R., Ravdin, P., Rubio, I. T., Saghatchian, M., Smilde, T. J., Sotiriou, C., Stork, L., Straehle, C., Thomas, G., Thompson, A. M., van der Hoeven, J. M., Vuylsteke, P., Bernards, R., Tryfonidis, K., Rutgers, E., & Piccart, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-08-25
Volume
375
Issue
8
Pages
717-729
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2517421365
Cited by
1,994
References
1
FWCI
76.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1602253
The paper
Cardoso, F., van’t Veer, L. J., Bogaerts, J., Slaets, L., Viale, G., Delaloge, S., Pierga, J.-Y., Brain, E., Causeret, S., DeLorenzi, M., Glas, A. M., Golfinopoulos, V., Goulioti, T., Knox, S., Matos, E., Meulemans, B., Neijenhuis, P. A., Nitz, U., Passalacqua, R., . . . Piccart, M. (2016). 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1602253

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.