Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Open access
Papp, Kim A., Blauvelt, Andrew, Bukhalo, Michael, Gooderham, Melinda, Krueger, James G., Lacour, Jean-Philippe, Menter, Alan, Philipp, Sandra, Sofen, Howard, Tyring, Stephen, Berner, Beate R., Visvanathan, Sudha, Pamulapati, Chandrasena, Bennett, Nathan, Flack, Mary, Scholl, Paul, Padula, Steven J.·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-23 is thought to be critical to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. We compared risankizumab (BI 655066), a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-23 by specifically targeting the p19 subunit and thus prevents interleukin-23 signaling, and ustekinumab, an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: We randomly assigned a total of 166 patients to receive subcutaneous injections of risankizumab (a single 18-mg dose at week 0 or 90-mg or 180-mg doses at weeks 0, 4, and 16) or ustekinumab (45 or 90 mg, according to body weight, at weeks 0, 4, and 16). The primary end point was a 90% or greater reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12. RESULTS: At week 12, the percentage of patients with a 90% or greater reduction in the PASI score was 77% (64 of 83 patients) for risankizumab (90-mg and 180-mg groups, pooled), as compared with 40% (16 of 40 patients) for ustekinumab (P<0.001); the percentage of patients with a 100% reduction in the PASI score was 45% in the pooled 90-mg and 180-mg risankizumab groups, as compared with 18% in the ustekinumab group. Efficacy was generally maintained up to 20 weeks after the final dose of 90 or 180 mg of risankizumab. In the 18-mg and 90-mg risankizumab groups and the ustekinumab group, 5 patients (12%), 6 patients (15%), and 3 patients (8%), respectively, had serious adverse events, including two basal-cell carcinomas and one major cardiovascular adverse event; there were no serious adverse events in the 180-mg risankizumab group. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, selective blockade of interleukin-23 with risankizumab was associated with clinical responses superior to those associated with ustekinumab. This trial was not large enough or of long enough duration to draw conclusions about safety. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02054481 ).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1607017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Papp, K. A., Blauvelt, A., Bukhalo, M., Gooderham, M., Krueger, J. G., Lacour, J.-P., Menter, A., Philipp, S., Sofen, H., Tyring, S., Berner, B. R., Visvanathan, S., Pamulapati, C., Bennett, N., Flack, M., Scholl, P., & Padula, S. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-04-20
Volume
376
Issue
16
Pages
1551-1560
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2606035821
Cited by
514
References
2
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1607017
The paper
Papp, K. A., Blauvelt, A., Bukhalo, M., Gooderham, M., Krueger, J. G., Lacour, J.-P., Menter, A., Philipp, S., Sofen, H., Tyring, S., Berner, B. R., Visvanathan, S., Pamulapati, C., Bennett, N., Flack, M., Scholl, P., & Padula, S. J. (2017). Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1607017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.