Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 800

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obinutuzumab for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma

Open access
Marcus, Robert, Davies, Andrew, Ando, Kiyoshi, Klapper, Wolfram, Opat, Stephen, Owen, Carolyn, Phillips, Elizabeth, Sangha, Randeep, Schlag, Rudolf, Seymour, John F., Townsend, William, Trněný, Marek, Wenger, Michael, Fingerle-Rowson, Günter, Rufibach, Kaspar, Moore, Tom, Herold, Michael, Hiddemann, Wolfgang·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rituximab-based immunochemotherapy has improved outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma. Obinutuzumab is a glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. We compared rituximab-based chemotherapy with obinutuzumab-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to undergo induction treatment with obinutuzumab-based chemotherapy or rituximab-based chemotherapy. Patients with a response received maintenance treatment for up to 2 years with the same antibody that they had received in induction. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 1202 patients with follicular lymphoma underwent randomization (601 patients in each group). After a median follow-up of 34.5 months (range, 0 to 54.5), a planned interim analysis showed that obinutuzumab-based chemotherapy resulted in a significantly lower risk of progression, relapse, or death than rituximab-based chemotherapy (estimated 3-year rate of progression-free survival, 80.0% vs. 73.3%; hazard ratio for progression, relapse, or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.85; P=0.001). Similar results were seen with regard to independently reviewed progression-free survival and other time-to-event end points. Response rates were similar in the two groups (88.5% in the obinutuzumab group and 86.9% in the rituximab group). Adverse events of grade 3 to 5 were more frequent in the obinutuzumab group than in the rituximab group (74.6% vs. 67.8%), as were serious adverse events (46.1% vs. 39.9%). The rates of adverse events resulting in death were similar in the two groups (4.0% in the obinutuzumab group and 3.4% in the rituximab group). The most common adverse events were infusion-related events that were considered by the investigators to be largely due to obinutuzumab in 353 of 595 patients (59.3%; 95% CI, 55.3 to 63.2) and to rituximab in 292 of 597 patients (48.9%; 95% CI, 44.9 to 52.9; P<0.001). Nausea and neutropenia were common. A total of 35 patients (5.8%) in the obinutuzumab group and 46 (7.7%) in the rituximab group died. CONCLUSIONS: Obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy and maintenance therapy resulted in longer progression-free survival than rituximab-based therapy. High-grade adverse events were more common with obinutuzumab-based chemotherapy. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; GALLIUM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01332968 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1614598

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 800

Metadata

Authors
Marcus, R., Davies, A., Ando, K., Klapper, W., Opat, S., Owen, C., Phillips, E., Sangha, R., Schlag, R., Seymour, J. F., Townsend, W., Trněný, M., Wenger, M., Fingerle-Rowson, G., Rufibach, K., Moore, T., Herold, M., & Hiddemann, W.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-10-05
Volume
377
Issue
14
Pages
1331-1344
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2761878534
Cited by
800
References
1
FWCI
49.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obinutuzumab for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1614598
The paper
Marcus, R., Davies, A., Ando, K., Klapper, W., Opat, S., Owen, C., Phillips, E., Sangha, R., Schlag, R., Seymour, J. F., Townsend, W., Trněný, M., Wenger, M., Fingerle-Rowson, G., Rufibach, K., Moore, T., Herold, M., & Hiddemann, W. (2017). Obinutuzumab for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1614598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.