Cited by 1,445Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials

Open access
Wang, Rui, Lagakos, Stephen W., Ware, James H., Hunter, David J., Drazen, Jeffrey M.·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The analysis of subgroups is often used as a way to glean additional information from data sets. The strengths and weaknesses of this approach and new Journal policies concerning the reporting of subgroup analyses are discussed in this article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsr077003

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, R., Lagakos, S. W., Ware, J. H., Hunter, D. J., & Drazen, J. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-11-22
Volume
357
Issue
21
Pages
2189-2194
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2098931866
Cited by
1,445
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 73
FWCI
62.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
subgroup analysis, clinical trials, statistical reporting, journal editorial policy, publication bias, treatment effect heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Quality Control, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review