The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer typically involves cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a trial to investigate whether the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery would improve outcomes among patients who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 245 patients who had at least stable disease after three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery either with or without administration of HIPEC with cisplatin (100 mg per square meter). Randomization was performed at the time of surgery in cases in which surgery that would result in no visible disease (complete cytoreduction) or surgery after which one or more residual tumors measuring 10 mm or less in diameter remain (optimal cytoreduction) was deemed to be feasible. Three additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel were administered postoperatively. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. Overall survival and the side-effect profile were key secondary end points. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, events of disease recurrence or death occurred in 110 of the 123 patients (89%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) and in 99 of the 122 patients (81%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (surgery-plus-HIPEC group) (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.87; P=0.003). The median recurrence-free survival was 10.7 months in the surgery group and 14.2 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. At a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 76 patients (62%) in the surgery group and 61 patients (50%) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group had died (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P=0.02). The median overall survival was 33.9 months in the surgery group and 45.7 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. The percentage of patients who had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was similar in the two groups (25% in the surgery group and 27% in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group, P=0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00426257 ; EudraCT number, 2006-003466-34 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colombo, N., Sessa, C., du Bois, A., Ledermann, J., McCluggage, W. G., McNeish, I., Morice, P., Pignata, S., Ray-Coquard, I., Vergote, I., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz062 · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationClinical and translational advances in ovarian cancer therapy
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., & Matulonis, U. A. (2023) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-023-00617-9 · Cited by 394
Ledermann, J. A., Matias-Guiu, X., Amant, F., Concin, N., Davidson, B., Fotopoulou, C., González-Martin, A., Gourley, C., Leary, A., Lorusso, D., et al. (2024) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015 · Cited by 333
Self-citationDiagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
Orr, B., & Edwards, R. P. (2018) · Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.010 · Cited by 322
Klaver, C. E. L., Wisselink, D. D., Punt, C. J. A., Snaebjornsson, P., Crezee, J., Aalbers, A. G. J., Brandt, A., Bremers, A. J. A., Burger, J. W. A., Fabry, H. F. J., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30239-0 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van Driel, W. J., Koole, S. N., Sikorska, K., Schagen van Leeuwen, J. H., Schreuder, H. W. R., Hermans, R. H. M., de Hingh, I. H. J. T., van der Velden, J., Arts, H. J., Massuger, L. F. A. G., Aalbers, A. G. J., Verwaal, V. J., Kieffer, J. M., Van de Vijver, K. K., van Tinteren, H., Aaronson, N. K., & Sonke, G. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2018-01-18
- Volume
- 378
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 230-240
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2784597821
- Cited by
- 1,426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 148.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1708618
- The paper
- van Driel, W. J., Koole, S. N., Sikorska, K., Schagen van Leeuwen, J. H., Schreuder, H. W. R., Hermans, R. H. M., de Hingh, I. H. J. T., van der Velden, J., Arts, H. J., Massuger, L. F. A. G., Aalbers, A. G. J., Verwaal, V. J., Kieffer, J. M., Van de Vijver, K. K., van Tinteren, H., Aaronson, N. K., & Sonke, G. S. (2018). Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1708618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.