Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,426

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer

Open access
van Driel, Willemien J., Koole, Simone N., Sikorska, Karolina, Schagen van Leeuwen, Jules H., Schreuder, Henk W.R., Hermans, Ralph H.M., de Hingh, Ignace H.J.T., van der Velden, Jacobus, Arts, Henriëtte J., Massuger, Leon F.A.G., Aalbers, Arend G.J., Verwaal, Victor J., Kieffer, Jacobien M., Van de Vijver, Koen K., van Tinteren, Harm, Aaronson, Neil K., Sonke, Gabe S.·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer typically involves cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a trial to investigate whether the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery would improve outcomes among patients who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 245 patients who had at least stable disease after three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery either with or without administration of HIPEC with cisplatin (100 mg per square meter). Randomization was performed at the time of surgery in cases in which surgery that would result in no visible disease (complete cytoreduction) or surgery after which one or more residual tumors measuring 10 mm or less in diameter remain (optimal cytoreduction) was deemed to be feasible. Three additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel were administered postoperatively. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. Overall survival and the side-effect profile were key secondary end points. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, events of disease recurrence or death occurred in 110 of the 123 patients (89%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) and in 99 of the 122 patients (81%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (surgery-plus-HIPEC group) (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.87; P=0.003). The median recurrence-free survival was 10.7 months in the surgery group and 14.2 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. At a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 76 patients (62%) in the surgery group and 61 patients (50%) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group had died (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P=0.02). The median overall survival was 33.9 months in the surgery group and 45.7 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. The percentage of patients who had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was similar in the two groups (25% in the surgery group and 27% in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group, P=0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00426257 ; EudraCT number, 2006-003466-34 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1708618

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,426

Metadata

Authors
van Driel, W. J., Koole, S. N., Sikorska, K., Schagen van Leeuwen, J. H., Schreuder, H. W. R., Hermans, R. H. M., de Hingh, I. H. J. T., van der Velden, J., Arts, H. J., Massuger, L. F. A. G., Aalbers, A. G. J., Verwaal, V. J., Kieffer, J. M., Van de Vijver, K. K., van Tinteren, H., Aaronson, N. K., & Sonke, G. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-01-18
Volume
378
Issue
3
Pages
230-240
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2784597821
Cited by
1,426
References
0
FWCI
148.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1708618
The paper
van Driel, W. J., Koole, S. N., Sikorska, K., Schagen van Leeuwen, J. H., Schreuder, H. W. R., Hermans, R. H. M., de Hingh, I. H. J. T., van der Velden, J., Arts, H. J., Massuger, L. F. A. G., Aalbers, A. G. J., Verwaal, V. J., Kieffer, J. M., Van de Vijver, K. K., van Tinteren, H., Aaronson, N. K., & Sonke, G. S. (2018). Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1708618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.