Cited by 522Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Residual-Function Heterozygotes with Cystic Fibrosis

Open access
Rowe, Steven M., Daines, Cori, Ringshausen, Felix C., Kerem, Eitan, Wilson, John, Tullis, Elizabeth, Nair, Nitin, Simard, Christopher +5 more·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUNDCystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the CFTR gene that lead to progressive respiratory decline.Some mutant CFTR proteins show residual function and respond to the CFTR potentiator ivacaftor in vitro, whereas ivacaftor alone does not restore activity to Phe508del mutant CFTR. METHODSWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3, crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivacaftor alone or in combination with tezacaftor, a CFTR corrector, in 248 patients 12 years of age or older who had cystic fibrosis and were heterozygous for the Phe508del mutation and a CFTR mutation associated with residual CFTR function.Patients were randomly assigned to one of six sequences, each involving two 8-week intervention periods separated by an 8-week washout period.They received tezacaftor-ivacaftor, ivacaftor monotherapy, or placebo.The primary end point was the absolute change in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) from the baseline value to the average of the week 4 and week 8 measurements in each intervention period. RESULTSThe number of analyzed intervention periods was 162 for tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 157 for ivacaftor alone, and 162 for placebo.The least-squares mean difference versus placebo with respect to the absolute change in the percentage of predicted FEV 1 was 6.8 percentage points for tezacaftor-ivacaftor and 4.7 percentage points for ivacaftor alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons).Scores on the respiratory domain of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, a quality-of-life measure, also significantly favored the active-treatment groups.The incidence of adverse events was similar across intervention groups; most events were mild or moderate in severity, with no discontinuations of the trial regimen due to adverse events for tezacaftorivacaftor and few for ivacaftor alone (1% of patients) and placebo (<1%). CONCLUSIONSCFTR modulator therapy with tezacaftor-ivacaftor or ivacaftor alone was efficacious in patients with cystic fibrosis who were heterozygous for the Phe508del deletion and a CFTR residual-function mutation.(Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and others; EXPAND ClinicalTrials.govnumber, NCT02392234.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1709847

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ivacaftor and tezacaftor-ivacaftor are approved therapies with well-characterized safety profiles.

    “Ivacaftor and tezacaftor–ivacaftor, two components of this triple combination, are approved therapies, with well-characterized safety profiles.10-12,30”

    From Elexacaftor–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor for Cystic Fibrosis with a Single Phe508del Allele (2019) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion reports that tezacaftor–ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated in this trial and that ivacaftor recapitulated its well-established safety profile; the Results > Safety section provides supporting adverse-event data. Our copy does not state that both treatments were approved therapies, so it does not support that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CFTR modulators treat the underlying cause of disease and improve clinical outcomes in persons with specific CFTR mutations.

    “CFTR modulators treat the underlying cause of disease and have improved clinical outcomes in persons with specific CFTR mutations.9-12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Elborn JS. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2016; 388: 2519– 31. 27140670
  2. [2]O’Sullivan BP, Freedman SD. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2009; 373: 1891– 904. 19403164
  3. [4]Castellani C, Cuppens H, Macek M Jr., Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice. J Cyst Fibros 2008; 7: 179– 96. 18456578 PMC2810954
  4. [5]Clancy JP, Jain M. Personalized medicine in cystic fibrosis: dawning of a new era. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 593– 7. 22723294
  5. [6]Van Goor F, Yu H, Burton B, Hoffman BJ. Effect of ivacaftor on CFTR forms with missense mutations associated with defects in protein processing or function. J Cyst Fibros 2014; 13: 29– 36. 23891399
  6. [7]McKone EF, Emerson SS, Edwards KL, Aitken ML. Effect of genotype on phenotype and mortality in cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2003; 361: 1671– 6. 12767731
  7. [8]Comer DM, Ennis M, McDowell C, Clinical phenotype of cystic fibrosis patients with the G551D mutation. QJM 2009; 102: 793– 8. 19734299
  8. [9]Rodman DM, Polis JM, Heltshe SL, Late diagnosis defines a unique population of long-term survivors of cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 621– 6. 15591474
  9. [10]Van Goor F, Hadida S, Grootenhuis P. Pharmacological rescue of mutant CFTR function for the treatment of cystic fibrosis In: Fermini B, Priest BT, eds. Ion channels. Topics in medicinal chemistry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 91– 120.
  10. [11]Davies JC, Cunningham S, Harris WT, Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ivacaftor in patients aged 2–5 years with cystic fibrosis and a CFTR gating mutation (KIWI): an open-label, single-arm study. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 107– 15. 26803277 PMC6734927
  11. [12]Ramsey BW, Davies J, McElvaney NG, A CFTR potentiator in patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D mutation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1663– 72. 22047557 PMC3230303
  12. [13]Rowe SM, McColley SA, Rietschel E, Lumacaftor/ivacaftor treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis heterozygous for F508del-CFTR. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14: 213– 9. 27898234 PMC5461999
  13. [14]Ratjen F, Hug C, Marigowda G, Efficacy and safety of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in patients aged 6–11 years with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-CFTR: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2017 6 8 [ Epub ahead of print]. 28606620
  14. [15]Davies J, Sheridan H, Bell N, Assessment of clinical response to ivacaftor with lung clearance index in cystic fibrosis patients with a G551D-CFTR mutation and preserved spirometry: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 630– 8. 24461666
  15. [17]Wainwright CE, Elborn JS, Ramsey BW, Lumacaftor-ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis homozygous for Phe508del CFTR. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 220– 31. 25981758 PMC4764353
  16. [18]Yu YC, Sohma Y, Hwang TC. On the mechanism of gating defects caused by the R117H mutation in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. J Physiol 2016; 594: 3227– 44. 26846474 PMC4908022
  17. [19]Pilewski J, Higgins M, Cooke J, Nick JA. EPS1.5 A phase 3 extension study evaluating the safety and efficacy of long-term ivacaftor (IVA) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and phenotypic or molecular evidence of residual CFTR function. J Cyst Fibros; 16: S37.
  18. [21]Quittner AL, Modi AC, Wainwright C, Otto K, Kirihara J, Montgomery AB. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference scores for the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory symptom scale in two populations of patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. Chest 2009; 135: 1610– 8. 19447923 PMC2821291
  19. [22]Konstan MW, McKone EF, Moss RB, Assessment of safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with combination lumacaftor and ivacaftor therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation (PROGRESS): a phase 3, extension study. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 107– 18. 28011037
  20. [23]Milla CE, Ratjen F, Marigowda G, Lumacaftor/ivacaftor in patients aged 6–11 years with cystic fibrosis and homozygous for F508del-CFTR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 912– 20. 27805836 PMC5440888
  21. [24]Flume PA, Liou TG, Borowitz DS, Ivacaftor in subjects with cystic fibrosis who are homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Chest 2012; 142: 718– 24. 22383668 PMC3435140
  22. [25]Moss RB, Flume PA, Elborn JS, Efficacy and safety of ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis who have an Arg117His-CFTR mutation: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 524– 33. 26070913 PMC4641035
  23. [26]Goss CH, Quittner AL. Patient-reported outcomes in cystic fibrosis. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2007; 4: 378– 86. 17652505 PMC2647603
  24. [28]Accurso FJ, Rowe SM, Clancy JP, Effect of VX-770 in persons with cystic fibrosis and the G551D-CFTR mutation. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1991– 2003. 21083385 PMC3148255
  25. [29]Courville CA, Tidwell S, Liu B, Accurso FJ, Dransfield MT, Rowe SM. Acquired defects in CFTR-dependent beta-adrenergic sweat secretion in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2014; 15: 25. 24568560 PMC4015030
  26. [30]Wilschanski M, Dupuis A, Ellis L, Mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene and in vivo transepithelial potentials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 787– 94. 16840743 PMC2648063

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, S. M., Daines, C., Ringshausen, F. C., Kerem, E., Wilson, J., Tullis, E., Nair, N., Simard, C., Han, L., Ingenito, E. P., McKee, C., Lekstrom-Himes, J., & Davies, J. C.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-11-23
Volume
377
Issue
21
Pages
2024-2035
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2765825922
Cited by
522
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
48.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U54TR001005)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R35HL135816)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK072482)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, tezacaftor/ivacaftor, ivacaftor, CFTR modulator therapy, CFTR potentiators, CFTR correctors, F508del mutation, heterozygous carriers, lung function, Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, quality of life, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aminophenols, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Heterozygote, Humans, Indoles, Male, Mutation, Quality of Life, Quinolones, Cross-Over Studies, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, Benzodioxoles, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review