The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The preferred timing of umbilical-cord clamping in preterm infants is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned fetuses from women who were expected to deliver before 30 weeks of gestation to either immediate clamping of the umbilical cord (≤10 seconds after delivery) or delayed clamping (≥60 seconds after delivery). The primary composite outcome was death or major morbidity (defined as severe brain injury on postnatal ultrasonography, severe retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or late-onset sepsis) by 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, accounting for multiple births. RESULTS: Of 1634 fetuses that underwent randomization, 1566 were born alive before 30 weeks of gestation; of these, 782 were assigned to immediate cord clamping and 784 to delayed cord clamping. The median time between delivery and cord clamping was 5 seconds and 60 seconds in the respective groups. Complete data on the primary outcome were available for 1497 infants (95.6%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome between infants assigned to delayed clamping (37.0%) and those assigned to immediate clamping (37.2%) (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.13; P=0.96). The mortality was 6.4% in the delayed-clamping group and 9.0% in the immediate-clamping group (P=0.03 in unadjusted analyses; P=0.39 after post hoc adjustment for multiple secondary outcomes). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidences of chronic lung disease or other major morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Among preterm infants, delayed cord clamping did not result in a lower incidence of the combined outcome of death or major morbidity at 36 weeks of gestation than immediate cord clamping. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC] and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre; APTS Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12610000633088 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
JOBE, A. H., & BANCALARI, E. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060 · Cited by 4,795
Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., & Smith, P. G. (1976) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1976.220 · Cited by 2,294
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome – 2019 Update
Sweet, D. G., Carnielli, V., Greisen, G., Hallman, M., Ozek, E., te Pas, A., Plavka, R., Roehr, C. C., Saugstad, O. D., Simeoni, U., et al. (2019) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000499361 · Cited by 1,613
Self-citationStatistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements
Davis, C. S. (2002) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b97287 · Cited by 577
Sweet, D. G., Carnielli, V., Greisen, G., Hallman, M., Ozek, E., Plavka, R., Saugstad, O. D., Simeoni, U., Speer, C. P., Vento, M., et al. (2013) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000349928 · Cited by 550
Self-citationRepeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment
Haybittle, J. L. (1971) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-44-526-793 · Cited by 517
High-Flow Nasal Cannulae in Very Preterm Infants after Extubation
Manley, B. J., Owen, L. S., Doyle, L. W., Andersen, C. C., Cartwright, D. W., Pritchard, M. A., Donath, S. M., & Davis, P. G. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1300071 · Cited by 345
Self-citationA proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well
(2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17965-3 · Cited by 324
The Primary Outcome Fails — What Next?
Pocock, S. J., & Stone, G. W. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1510064 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Fleiss, N., Coggins, S. A., Lewis, A. N., Zeigler, A., Cooksey, K. E., Walker, L. A., Husain, A. N., de Jong, B. S., Wallman-Stokes, A., Alrifai, M. W., et al. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36518 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarnow-Mordi, W., Morris, J., Kirby, A., Robledo, K., Askie, L., Brown, R., Evans, N., Finlayson, S., Fogarty, M., Gebski, V., Ghadge, A., Hague, W., Isaacs, D., Jeffery, M., Keech, A., Kluckow, M., Popat, H., Sebastian, L., Aagaard, K., Belfort, M., Pammi, M., Abdel-Latif, M., Reynolds, G., Ariff, S., Sheikh, L., Chen, Y., Colditz, P., Liley, H., Pritchard, M., de Luca, D., de Waal, K., Forder, P., Duley, L., El-Naggar, W., Gill, A., Newnham, J., Simmer, K., Groom, K., Weston, P., Gullam, J., Patel, H., Koh, G., Lui, K., Marlow, N., Morris, S., Sehgal, A., Wallace, E., Soll, R., Young, L., Sweet, D., Walker, S., Watkins, A., Wright, I., Osborn, D., & Simes, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 2445-2455
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2765444449
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 35.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1711281
- The paper
- Tarnow-Mordi, W., Morris, J., Kirby, A., Robledo, K., Askie, L., Brown, R., Evans, N., Finlayson, S., Fogarty, M., Gebski, V., Ghadge, A., Hague, W., Isaacs, D., Jeffery, M., Keech, A., Kluckow, M., Popat, H., Sebastian, L., Aagaard, K., . . . Simes, J. (2017). Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1711281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
