The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
Hébert, P. C., Wells, G., Blajchman, M. A., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Pagliarello, G., Tweeddale, M., Schweitzer, I., & Yetisir, E. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902113400601 · Cited by 5,187
Murphy, G. J., Reeves, B. C., Rogers, C. A., Rizvi, S. I. A., Culliford, L., & Angelini, G. D. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.698977 · Cited by 1,371
Cited by
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion
Carson, J. L., Stanworth, S. J., Dennis, J. A., Trivella, M., Roubinian, N., Fergusson, D. A., Triulzi, D., Dorée, C., & Hébert, P. C. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub5 · Cited by 322
Self-citationRestrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia
Carson, J. L., Brooks, M. M., Hébert, P. C., Goodman, S. G., Bertolet, M., Glynn, S. A., Chaitman, B. R., Simon, T., Lopes, R. D., Goldsweig, A. M., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2307983 · Cited by 270
Self-citationHirano, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Kondo, Y., Okamoto, K., & Tanaka, H. (2019) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-019-2543-1 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazer, C. D., Whitlock, R. P., Fergusson, D. A., Hall, J., Belley-Cote, E., Connolly, K., Khanykin, B., Gregory, A. J., de Médicis, É., McGuinness, S., Royse, A., Carrier, F. M., Young, P. J., Villar, J. C., Grocott, H. P., Seeberger, M. D., Fremes, S., Lellouche, F., Syed, S., Byrne, K., Bagshaw, S. M., Hwang, N. C., Mehta, C., Painter, T. W., Royse, C., Verma, S., Hare, G. M. T., Cohen, A., Thorpe, K. E., Jüni, P., & Shehata, N.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-11-30
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2133-2144
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2767380802
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1711818
- The paper
- Mazer, C. D., Whitlock, R. P., Fergusson, D. A., Hall, J., Belley-Cote, E., Connolly, K., Khanykin, B., Gregory, A. J., de Médicis, É., McGuinness, S., Royse, A., Carrier, F. M., Young, P. J., Villar, J. C., Grocott, H. P., Seeberger, M. D., Fremes, S., Lellouche, F., Syed, S., . . . Shehata, N. (2017). Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1711818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.