Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 764

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery

Open access
Mazer, C. David, Whitlock, Richard P., Fergusson, Dean A., Hall, Judith, Belley-Cote, Emilie, Connolly, Katherine, Khanykin, Boris, Gregory, Alexander J., de Médicis, Étienne, McGuinness, Shay, Royse, Alistair, Carrier, François M., Young, Paul J., Villar, Juan C., Grocott, Hilary P., Seeberger, Manfred D., Fremes, Stephen, Lellouche, François, Syed, Summer, Byrne, Kelly, Bagshaw, Sean M., Hwang, Nian C., Mehta, Chirag, Painter, Thomas W., Royse, Colin, Verma, Subodh, Hare, Gregory M.T., Cohen, Ashley, Thorpe, Kevin E., Jüni, Peter, Shehata, Nadine·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1711818

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 764

Metadata

Authors
Mazer, C. D., Whitlock, R. P., Fergusson, D. A., Hall, J., Belley-Cote, E., Connolly, K., Khanykin, B., Gregory, A. J., de Médicis, É., McGuinness, S., Royse, A., Carrier, F. M., Young, P. J., Villar, J. C., Grocott, H. P., Seeberger, M. D., Fremes, S., Lellouche, F., Syed, S., Byrne, K., Bagshaw, S. M., Hwang, N. C., Mehta, C., Painter, T. W., Royse, C., Verma, S., Hare, G. M. T., Cohen, A., Thorpe, K. E., Jüni, P., & Shehata, N.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-11-30
Volume
377
Issue
22
Pages
2133-2144
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2767380802
Cited by
764
References
2
FWCI
43.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1711818
The paper
Mazer, C. D., Whitlock, R. P., Fergusson, D. A., Hall, J., Belley-Cote, E., Connolly, K., Khanykin, B., Gregory, A. J., de Médicis, É., McGuinness, S., Royse, A., Carrier, F. M., Young, P. J., Villar, J. C., Grocott, H. P., Seeberger, M. D., Fremes, S., Lellouche, F., Syed, S., . . . Shehata, N. (2017). Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1711818

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.