Cited by 940Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

Venetoclax-Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Open access
Seymour, John F., Kipps, Thomas J., Eichhorst, Barbara, Hillmen, Peter, D’Rozario, James, Assouline, Sarit, Owen, Carolyn, Gerecitano, John +12 more·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venetoclax inhibits BCL2, an antiapoptotic protein that is pathologically overexpressed and that is central to the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. We evaluated the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 389 patients to receive venetoclax for up to 2 years (from day 1 of cycle 1) plus rituximab for the first 6 months (venetoclax-rituximab group) or bendamustine plus rituximab for 6 months (bendamustine-rituximab group). The trial design did not include crossover to venetoclax plus rituximab for patients in the bendamustine-rituximab group in whom progression occurred. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, the rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (32 events of progression or death in 194 patients) than in the bendamustine-rituximab group (114 events in 195 patients); the 2-year rates of progression-free survival were 84.9% and 36.3%, respectively (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.25; P<0.001 by the stratified log-rank test). The benefit was maintained across all clinical and biologic subgroups, including the subgroup of patients with chromosome 17p deletion; the 2-year rate of progression-free survival among patients with chromosome 17p deletion was 81.5% in the venetoclax-rituximab group versus 27.8% in the bendamustine-rituximab group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.29), and the 2-year rate among those without chromosome 17p deletion was 85.9% versus 41.0% (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.32). The benefit of venetoclax plus rituximab over bendamustine plus rituximab was confirmed by an independent review committee assessment of progression-free survival and other secondary efficacy end points. The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group than in the bendamustine-rituximab group, but the rates of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia and infections or infestations were lower with venetoclax than with bendamustine. The rate of grade 3 or 4 tumor lysis syndrome in the venetoclax-rituximab group was 3.1% (6 of 194 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, venetoclax plus rituximab resulted in significantly higher rates of progression-free survival than bendamustine plus rituximab. (Funded by Genentech and AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02005471 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1713976

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients who have not previously received venetoclax, combination therapy with venetoclax and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody can achieve durable remissions in most cases.

    “In patientswho have not previously received venetoclax, combination therapy with venetoclax and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb)can achieve durable remissions in most cases(54).”

    From Resistance Mechanisms and Approach to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia after BTK Inhibitor Therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Efficacy section reports 84.9% progression-free survival at two years with venetoclax plus rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, supporting benefit in most patients. But the Discussion says additional follow-up was needed to assess durability after treatment stopped. The paper studies rituximab specifically, and the available Patients section does not establish that all participants were previously untreated with venetoclax. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Fischer K, Cramer P, Busch R, et al. Bendamustine combined with rituximab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multi- center phase II trial of the German Chron- ic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 3559-66.
  2. Burger JA, Keating MJ, Wierda WG, et al. Safety and activity of ibrutinib plus rituximab for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a single- arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 1090-9.
  3. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O'Brien S, et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previ- ously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 213-23.
  4. Byrd JC, Harrington B, O'Brien S, et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in relapsed chron- ic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 323-32.
  5. Furman RR, Sharman JP, Coutre SE, et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 997-1007.
  6. Zelenetz AD, Barrientos JC, Brown JR, et al. Idelalisib or placebo in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in pa- tients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: interim results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 297-311.
  7. Chanan-Khan A, Cramer P, Demirkan F, et al. Ibrutinib combined with benda- mustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocyt- ic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lym- phoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double- blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 200-11.
  8. Tam CS, Stilgenbauer S. How best to manage patients with chronic lympho- cytic leukemia with 17p deletion and/or TP53 mutation? Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 56: 587-93.
  9. Cory S, Roberts AW, Colman PM, Ad- ams JM. Targeting BCL-2-like proteins to kill cancer cells. Trends Cancer 2016; 2: 443-60.
  10. Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, et al. miR-15 and miR-16 Induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 13944-9.
  11. Del Gaizo Moore V, Brown JR, Certo M, Love TM, Novina CD, Letai A. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sen- sitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 112-21.
  12. Robertson LE, Plunkett W, McConnell K, Keating MJ, McDonnell TJ. Bcl-2 ex- pression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and its correlation with the induction of apoptosis and clinical outcome. Leukemia 1996; 10: 456-9.
  13. Souers AJ, Leverson JD, Boghaert ER, et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat Med 2013; 19: 202-8.
  14. Anderson MA, Deng J, Seymour JF, et al. The BCL2 selective inhibitor veneto- clax induces rapid onset apoptosis of CLL cells in patients via a TP53-independent mechanism. Blood 2016; 127: 3215-24.
  15. Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, et al. Venetoclax in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 768-78.
  16. Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in re- lapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 311-22.
  17. Byrd JC, Peterson BL, Morrison VA, et al. Randomized phase 2 study of fludara- bine with concurrent versus sequential treatment with rituximab in symptomat- ic, untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from Can- cer and Leukemia Group B 9712 (CALGB 9712). Blood 2003; 101: 6-14.
  18. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al. Addition of rituximab to fludara- bine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a ran- domised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 1164-74.
  19. Ferrajoli A, Keating MJ, O'Brien S, Cortes J, Thomas DA. Experience with rituximab immunotherapy as an early inter- vention in patients with Rai stage 0 to II chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 2011; 117: 3182-6.
  20. Thijssen R, Slinger E, Weller K, et al. Resistance to ABT-199 induced by micro- environmental signals in chronic lympho- cytic leukemia can be counteracted by CD20 antibodies or kinase inhibitors. Haematologica 2015; 100(8): e302-e306.
  21. Seymour JF, Ma S, Brander DM, et al. Venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukae- mia: a phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 230-40.
  22. Kwok M, Rawstron AC, Varghese A, et al. Minimal residual disease is an inde- pendent predictor for 10-year survival in CLL. Blood 2016; 128: 2770-3.
  23. Kovacs G, Robrecht S, Fink AM, et al. Minimal residual disease assessment im- proves prediction of outcome in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve partial response: compre- hensive analysis of two phase III studies of the German CLL Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 3758-65.
  24. Böttcher S, Ritgen M, Fischer K, et al. Minimal residual disease quantification is an independent predictor of progres- sion-free and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multivariate analy- sis from the randomized GCLLSG CLL8 trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 980-8.
  25. Dimier N, Delmar P, Ward C, Morariu- Zamfir R, Fingerle-Rowson G. Model for predicting effect of treatment on progres- sion-free survival using minimal residual disease as a surrogate endpoint in chron- ic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2015; 126: 720.
  26. Hallek M. Presentation and discussion of revised iwCLL guidelines for the ap- proach to a CLL patient. Presented at the XVII International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, New York, May 12-15, 2017.
  27. Cheson BD, Wendtner CM, Pieper A, et al. Optimal use of bendamustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodg- kin lymphomas, and multiple myeloma: treatment recommendations from an inter- national consensus panel. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2010; 10: 21-7.
  28. International Conference on Harmon- isation of Technical Requirements for Reg- istration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) adopts consolidated guideline on good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Int Dig Health Legis 1997; 48: 231-4.
  29. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treat- ment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updat- ing the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 2008; 111: 5446-56.
  30. Pospisilova S, Gonzalez D, Malcikova J, et al. ERIC recommendations on TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2012; 26: 1458-61.
  31. Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1910-6. The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm.org on August 29, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. n engl j med 378;12 nejm.org March 22, 2018 1120 Venetoclax-Rituximab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 35. Westfall PH, Krishen A. Optimally weighted, fixed sequence and gatekeeper multiple testing procedures. J Stat Plan Inference 2001; 99: 25-40.
  32. Shanafelt TD. Predicting clinical out- come in CLL: how and why. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009; 1: 421-9.
  33. Robak T, Dmoszynska A, Solal-Céligny P, et al. Rituximab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide prolongs progression- free survival compared with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone in previous- ly treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1756-65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seymour, J. F., Kipps, T. J., Eichhorst, B., Hillmen, P., D’Rozario, J., Assouline, S., Owen, C., Gerecitano, J., Robak, T., De la Serna, J., Jaeger, U., Cartron, G., Montillo, M., Humerickhouse, R., Punnoose, E. A., Li, Y., Boyer, M., Humphrey, K., Mobasher, M., & Kater, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • From the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC (J.F.S.), and the John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (J.D.) — all in Australia; the University of California School of Medicine, San Diego (T.J.K.), and Genentech, South San Francisco (E.A.P., Y.L., M. Mobasher) — both in California; University Hospital Cologne and the Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne–Bonn, Cologne, Germany (B.E.); St....
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-03-22
Volume
378
Issue
12
Pages
1107-1120
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2792666902
Cited by
940
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
65.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd
  • AbbVie Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Keywords
venetoclax, rituximab, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, relapsed/refractory disease, BCL-2 inhibition, bendamustine, progression-free survival, chromosome 17p deletion, combination therapy, targeted therapy, survival outcomes, adverse events, relapse after treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Rituximab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neutropenia, Recurrence, Sulfonamides, Tumor Lysis Syndrome, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Neoplasm, Residual, Disease-Free Survival, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review