Cited by 692Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFlavonoids in Medical Research

Venetoclax Combined With Low-Dose Cytarabine for Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From a Phase Ib/II Study

Open access
Wei, Andrew H., Strickland, Stephen A., Hou, Jing-Zhou, Fiedler, Walter, Lin, Tara L., Walter, Roland B., Enjeti, Anoop, Tiong, Ing Soo +12 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Effective treatment options are limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. An international phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax, a selective B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 inhibitor, together with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in older adults with AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults 60 years or older with previously untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled. Prior treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, including hypomethylating agents (HMA), was permitted. Eighty-two patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose: venetoclax 600 mg per day orally in 28-day cycles, with LDAC (20 mg/m 2 per day) administered subcutaneously on days 1 to 10. Key end points were tolerability, safety, response rates, duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median age was 74 years (range, 63 to 90 years), 49% had secondary AML, 29% had prior HMA treatment, and 32% had poor-risk cytogenetic features. Common grade 3 or greater adverse events were febrile neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and WBC count decreased (34%). Early (30-day) mortality was 6%. Fifty-four percent achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (median time to first response, 1.4 months). The median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 14.2), and median DOR was 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 14.9 months). Among patients without prior HMA exposure, CR/CR with incomplete blood count recovery was achieved in 62%, median DOR was 14.8 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to not reached), and median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 18.4 months). CONCLUSION: Venetoclax plus LDAC has a manageable safety profile, producing rapid and durable remissions in older adults with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. High remission rate and low early mortality combined with rapid and durable remission make venetoclax and LDAC an attractive and novel treatment for older adults not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.18.01600

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historical outcomes with HMA treatment, including azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine administered with venetoclax, had median overall survival of 7.2 and 3.7 months, respectively.

    “These findings compare favourably to historical outcomes with HMA treatment, including azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine administered with venetoclax where median OS was 7.2 and 3.7 months, respectively.32,33”

    From Eprenetapopt (APR-246) and Azacitidine in <i>TP53</i> -Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results > Efficacy section (page unavailable) reports median overall survival of 10.1 months for patients receiving venetoclax plus low-dose cytarabine, not the claimed 3.7 months. The Discussion compares that regimen with azacitidine monotherapy; it does not report 7.2 months for azacitidine plus venetoclax. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Dennis M, Hills RK, Russell NH, et al: An evaluation of 17 years of low dose cytarabine as therapy for AML patients not fit for intensive treatment, including patients with adverse cytogenetics, shows improving survival, potential underutilisation and highlights the need for new therapy. Blood 2017; 130:3874

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, A. H., Strickland, S. A., Hou, J.-Z., Fiedler, W., Lin, T. L., Walter, R. B., Enjeti, A., Tiong, I. S., Savona, M., Lee, S., Chyla, B., Popovic, R., Salem, A. H., Agarwal, S., Xu, T., Fakouhi, K. M., Humerickhouse, R., Hong, W.-J., Hayslip, J., & Roboz, G. J.
Affiliations
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
  • Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • AbbVie (United States) (US)
  • Ain Shams University (EG)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Wei, Andrew H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
37
Issue
15
Pages
1277-1284
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2922692686
Cited by
692
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 55
FWCI
77.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Ariad Pharmaceuticals
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals
  • Celgene
  • Karyopharm Therapeutics
  • Array BioPharma
  • Helsinn
  • Actinium Pharmaceuticals
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • TG Therapeutics
  • Astex Pharmaceuticals
  • Clovis Oncology
  • LAM Therapeutics
  • Sunesis
  • MEI Pharma
  • Agios Pharmaceuticals
  • Arog Pharmaceuticals
  • Mateon Therapeutics
  • Incyte
  • Celltrion
  • Argenx
  • Eisai
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  • Ono Pharmaceutical
  • Genentech
  • Helsinn Therapeutics
  • Kite Pharma
  • Pharmacyclics
  • Celator Pharmaceuticals
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Flavonoids in Medical Research
Keywords
venetoclax, low-dose cytarabine, acute myeloid leukemia, older adults, BCL-2 inhibitor, hypomethylating agents, complete remission, overall survival, duration of response, febrile neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, combination therapy, safety and tolerability, secondary acute myeloid leukemia, poor-risk cytogenetics
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cytarabine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Sulfonamides, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review