Cited by 1,344Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Apalutamide Treatment and Metastasis-free Survival in Prostate Cancer

Open access
Smith, Matthew R., Saad, Fred, Chowdhury, Simon, Oudard, Stéphane, Hadaschik, Boris A., Graff, Julie N., Olmos, David, Mainwaring, Paul N. +10 more·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apalutamide, a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for the development of metastasis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo. All the patients continued to receive androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, which was defined as the time from randomization to the first detection of distant metastasis on imaging or death. RESULTS: A total of 1207 men underwent randomization (806 to the apalutamide group and 401 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 378 events had occurred, median metastasis-free survival was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.35; P<0.001). Time to symptomatic progression was significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). The rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen was 10.6% in the apalutamide group and 7.0% in the placebo group. The following adverse events occurred at a higher rate with apalutamide than with placebo: rash (23.8% vs. 5.5%), hypothyroidism (8.1% vs. 2.0%), and fracture (11.7% vs. 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Among men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis-free survival and time to symptomatic progression were significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; SPARTAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01946204 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1715546

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of AR-targeted therapies on patient survival.

    “Multiple phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of AR-targeted therapies on patient survival9–18.”

    From Genome-scale CRISPR screens identify PTGES3 as a direct modulator of androgen receptor function in advanced prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Primary End Point section reports significantly longer metastasis-free survival with apalutamide than with placebo. But the Discussion's secondary-endpoint table reports that the overall-survival result did not meet the efficacy threshold (hazard ratio 0.70, P=0.07). This trial therefore supports a survival-related benefit, but not a demonstrated overall-survival benefit; it also cannot by itself establish the claim about multiple trials. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. R., Saad, F., Chowdhury, S., Oudard, S., Hadaschik, B. A., Graff, J. N., Olmos, D., Mainwaring, P. N., Lee, J. Y., Uemura, H., Lopez-Gitlitz, A., Trudel, G. C., Espina, B. M., Shu, Y., Park, Y. C., Rackoff, W. R., Yu, M. K., & Small, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • From the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.R.S.); Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal (F.S.); Guy’s, King’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, Great Maze Pond, London (S.C.); Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris (S.O.); University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)–University Hospital Essen, Essen, and Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg — both in Germany (B.A.H.); Veterans Affairs...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-04-12
Volume
378
Issue
15
Pages
1408-1418
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2792086148
Cited by
1,344
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 179 · 2021: 205 · 2020: 196 · 2019: 180 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
128.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Janssen Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
apalutamide, castration-resistant prostate cancer, androgen receptor antagonists, metastasis-free survival, androgen deprivation therapy, PSA doubling time, adverse events, hypothyroidism, fracture, rash
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Androgen Antagonists, Double-Blind Method, Exanthema, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Thiohydantoins, Proportional Hazards Models, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review