Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness

Open access
Girard, Timothy D., Exline, Matthew C., Carson, Shannon S., Hough, Catherine L., Rock, Peter, Gong, Michelle N., Douglas, Ivor S., Malhotra, Atul, Owens, Robert L., Feinstein, Daniel J., Khan, Babar, Pisani, Margaret A., Hyzy, Robert C., Schmidt, Gregory A., Schweickert, William D., Hite, R. Duncan, Bowton, David L., Masica, Andrew L., Thompson, Jennifer L., Chandrasekhar, Rameela, Pun, Brenda T., Strength, Cayce, Boehm, Leanne M., Jackson, James C., Pandharipande, Pratik P., Brummel, Nathan E., Hughes, Christopher G., Patel, Mayur B., Stollings, Joanna L., Bernard, Gordon R., Dittus, Robert S., Ely, E. Wesley·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data on the effects of antipsychotic medications on delirium in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with acute respiratory failure or shock and hypoactive or hyperactive delirium to receive intravenous boluses of haloperidol (maximum dose, 20 mg daily), ziprasidone (maximum dose, 40 mg daily), or placebo. The volume and dose of a trial drug or placebo was halved or doubled at 12-hour intervals on the basis of the presence or absence of delirium, as detected with the use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, and of side effects of the intervention. The primary end point was the number of days alive without delirium or coma during the 14-day intervention period. Secondary end points included 30-day and 90-day survival, time to freedom from mechanical ventilation, and time to ICU and hospital discharge. Safety end points included extrapyramidal symptoms and excessive sedation. RESULTS: Written informed consent was obtained from 1183 patients or their authorized representatives. Delirium developed in 566 patients (48%), of whom 89% had hypoactive delirium and 11% had hyperactive delirium. Of the 566 patients, 184 were randomly assigned to receive placebo, 192 to receive haloperidol, and 190 to receive ziprasidone. The median duration of exposure to a trial drug or placebo was 4 days (interquartile range, 3 to 7). The median number of days alive without delirium or coma was 8.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6 to 9.9) in the placebo group, 7.9 (95% CI, 4.4 to 9.6) in the haloperidol group, and 8.7 (95% CI, 5.9 to 10.0) in the ziprasidone group (P=0.26 for overall effect across trial groups). The use of haloperidol or ziprasidone, as compared with placebo, had no significant effect on the primary end point (odds ratios, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.21] and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.48], respectively). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to the secondary end points or the frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The use of haloperidol or ziprasidone, as compared with placebo, in patients with acute respiratory failure or shock and hypoactive or hyperactive delirium in the ICU did not significantly alter the duration of delirium. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center; MIND-USA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01211522 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1808217

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Girard, T. D., Exline, M. C., Carson, S. S., Hough, C. L., Rock, P., Gong, M. N., Douglas, I. S., Malhotra, A., Owens, R. L., Feinstein, D. J., Khan, B., Pisani, M. A., Hyzy, R. C., Schmidt, G. A., Schweickert, W. D., Hite, R. D., Bowton, D. L., Masica, A. L., Thompson, J. L., Chandrasekhar, R., Pun, B. T., Strength, C., Boehm, L. M., Jackson, J. C., Pandharipande, P. P., Brummel, N. E., Hughes, C. G., Patel, M. B., Stollings, J. L., Bernard, G. R., Dittus, R. S., & Ely, E. W.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
379
Issue
26
Pages
2506-2516
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2896197442
Cited by
573
References
41
FWCI
49.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1808217
The paper
Girard, T. D., Exline, M. C., Carson, S. S., Hough, C. L., Rock, P., Gong, M. N., Douglas, I. S., Malhotra, A., Owens, R. L., Feinstein, D. J., Khan, B., Pisani, M. A., Hyzy, R. C., Schmidt, G. A., Schweickert, W. D., Hite, R. D., Bowton, D. L., Masica, A. L., Thompson, J. L., . . . Ely, E. W. (2018). Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1808217

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.