Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 962

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ibrutinib Regimens versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Patients with Untreated CLL

Open access
Woyach, Jennifer A., Ruppert, Amy S., Heerema, Nyla A., Zhao, Weiqiang, Booth, Allison M., Ding, Wei, Bartlett, Nancy L., Brander, Danielle M., Barr, Paul M., Rogers, Kerry A., Parikh, Sameer A., Coutre, Steven, Hurria, Arti, Brown, Jennifer R., Lozanski, Gerard, Blachly, James S., Ozer, Hatice G., Major-Elechi, Brittny, Fruth, Briant, Nattam, Sreenivasa, Larson, Richard A., Erba, Harry, Litzow, Mark, Owen, Carolyn, Kuzma, Charles, Abramson, Jeremy S., Little, Richard F., Smith, Scott E., Stone, Richard M., Mandrekar, Sumithra J., Byrd, John C.·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) since 2016 but has not been compared with chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with rituximab, relative to chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: Patients 65 years of age or older who had untreated CLL were randomly assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, ibrutinib, or ibrutinib plus rituximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board made the decision to release the data after the protocol-specified efficacy threshold had been met. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, 182 to receive ibrutinib, and 182 to receive ibrutinib plus rituximab. Median progression-free survival was reached only with bendamustine plus rituximab. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 2 years was 74% with bendamustine plus rituximab and was higher with ibrutinib alone (87%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.58; P<0.001) and with ibrutinib plus rituximab (88%; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the ibrutinib-plus-rituximab group and the ibrutinib group with regard to progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.62; P=0.49). With a median follow-up of 38 months, there was no significant difference among the three treatment groups with regard to overall survival. The rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 hematologic adverse events was higher with bendamustine plus rituximab (61%) than with ibrutinib or ibrutinib plus rituximab (41% and 39%, respectively), whereas the rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 nonhematologic adverse events was lower with bendamustine plus rituximab (63%) than with the ibrutinib-containing regimens (74% with each regimen). CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients with untreated CLL, treatment with ibrutinib was superior to treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. There was no significant difference between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Pharmacyclics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01886872 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1812836

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 962

Metadata

Authors
Woyach, J. A., Ruppert, A. S., Heerema, N. A., Zhao, W., Booth, A. M., Ding, W., Bartlett, N. L., Brander, D. M., Barr, P. M., Rogers, K. A., Parikh, S. A., Coutre, S., Hurria, A., Brown, J. R., Lozanski, G., Blachly, J. S., Ozer, H. G., Major-Elechi, B., Fruth, B., Nattam, S., Larson, R. A., Erba, H., Litzow, M., Owen, C., Kuzma, C., Abramson, J. S., Little, R. F., Smith, S. E., Stone, R. M., Mandrekar, S. J., & Byrd, J. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
379
Issue
26
Pages
2517-2528
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2902484351
Cited by
962
References
1
FWCI
57.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ibrutinib Regimens versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Patients with Untreated CLL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1812836
The paper
Woyach, J. A., Ruppert, A. S., Heerema, N. A., Zhao, W., Booth, A. M., Ding, W., Bartlett, N. L., Brander, D. M., Barr, P. M., Rogers, K. A., Parikh, S. A., Coutre, S., Hurria, A., Brown, J. R., Lozanski, G., Blachly, J. S., Ozer, H. G., Major-Elechi, B., Fruth, B., . . . Byrd, J. C. (2018). Ibrutinib Regimens versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Patients with Untreated CLL. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1812836

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.