The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ibrutinib Regimens versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Patients with Untreated CLL
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) since 2016 but has not been compared with chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with rituximab, relative to chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: Patients 65 years of age or older who had untreated CLL were randomly assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, ibrutinib, or ibrutinib plus rituximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board made the decision to release the data after the protocol-specified efficacy threshold had been met. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, 182 to receive ibrutinib, and 182 to receive ibrutinib plus rituximab. Median progression-free survival was reached only with bendamustine plus rituximab. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 2 years was 74% with bendamustine plus rituximab and was higher with ibrutinib alone (87%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.58; P<0.001) and with ibrutinib plus rituximab (88%; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the ibrutinib-plus-rituximab group and the ibrutinib group with regard to progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.62; P=0.49). With a median follow-up of 38 months, there was no significant difference among the three treatment groups with regard to overall survival. The rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 hematologic adverse events was higher with bendamustine plus rituximab (61%) than with ibrutinib or ibrutinib plus rituximab (41% and 39%, respectively), whereas the rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 nonhematologic adverse events was lower with bendamustine plus rituximab (63%) than with the ibrutinib-containing regimens (74% with each regimen). CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients with untreated CLL, treatment with ibrutinib was superior to treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. There was no significant difference between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Pharmacyclics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01886872 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Venetoclax-Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Seymour, J. F., Kipps, T. J., Eichhorst, B., Hillmen, P., D’Rozario, J., Assouline, S., Owen, C., Gerecitano, J., Robak, T., De la Serna, J., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1713976 · Cited by 940
Self-citation
Cited by
Venetoclax and Obinutuzumab in Patients with CLL and Coexisting Conditions
Fischer, K., Al-Sawaf, O., Bahlo, J., Fink, A.-M., Tandon, M., Dixon, M., Robrecht, S., Warburton, S., Humphrey, K., Samoylova, O., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1815281 · Cited by 873
Tam, C. S., Brown, J. R., Kahl, B. S., Ghia, P., Giannopoulos, K., Jurczak, W., Šimkovič, M., Shadman, M., Österborg, A., Laurenti, L., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00293-5 · Cited by 291
Self-citationKadambi, S., Loh, K. P., Dunne, R., Magnuson, A., Maggiore, R., Zittel, J., Flannery, M., Inglis, J., Gilmore, N., Mohamed, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0421-z · Cited by 149
Nakhoda, S., Vistarop, A., & Wang, Y. L. (2023) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.18418 · Cited by 104
Blombery, P., Thompson, E. R., Lew, T. E., Tiong, I. S., Bennett, R., Cheah, C. Y., Lewis, K. L., Handunnetti, S. M., Tang, C. P. S., Roberts, A., et al. (2022) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008325 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Woyach, J. A., Ruppert, A. S., Heerema, N. A., Zhao, W., Booth, A. M., Ding, W., Bartlett, N. L., Brander, D. M., Barr, P. M., Rogers, K. A., Parikh, S. A., Coutre, S., Hurria, A., Brown, J. R., Lozanski, G., Blachly, J. S., Ozer, H. G., Major-Elechi, B., Fruth, B., Nattam, S., Larson, R. A., Erba, H., Litzow, M., Owen, C., Kuzma, C., Abramson, J. S., Little, R. F., Smith, S. E., Stone, R. M., Mandrekar, S. J., & Byrd, J. C.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2018-12-27
- Volume
- 379
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 2517-2528
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2902484351
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 57.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ibrutinib Regimens versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Patients with Untreated CLL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1812836
- The paper
- Woyach, J. A., Ruppert, A. S., Heerema, N. A., Zhao, W., Booth, A. M., Ding, W., Bartlett, N. L., Brander, D. M., Barr, P. M., Rogers, K. A., Parikh, S. A., Coutre, S., Hurria, A., Brown, J. R., Lozanski, G., Blachly, J. S., Ozer, H. G., Major-Elechi, B., Fruth, B., . . . Byrd, J. C. (2018). Ibrutinib Regimens versus Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Patients with Untreated CLL. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1812836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.