CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,862CAR-T cell therapy researchLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

KTE-X19 CAR T cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma

Open access
Wang, Michael, Munoz, Javier, Goy, Andre, Locke, Frederick L., Jacobson, Caron A., Hill, Brian T., Timmerman, John M., Holmes, Houston, Jaglowski, Samantha, Flinn, Ian W., McSweeney, Peter A., Miklos, David B., Pagel, John M., Kersten, Marie-Jose, Milpied, Noel, Fung, Henry, Topp, Max S., Houot, Roch, Beitinjaneh, Amer, Peng, Weimin, Zheng, Lianqing, Rossi, John M., Jain, Rajul K., Rao, Arati V., Reagan, Patrick M.·2020·New England Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1914347PMC PMC7731441
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma who have disease progression during or after the receipt of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy have a poor prognosis. KTE-X19, an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, may have benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. METHODS: CAR T cells per kilogram of body weight. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response) as assessed by an independent radiologic review committee according to the Lugano classification. Per the protocol, the primary efficacy analysis was to be conducted after 60 patients had been treated and followed for 7 months. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were enrolled. KTE-X19 was manufactured for 71 patients and administered to 68. The primary efficacy analysis showed that 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84 to 98) of the 60 patients in the primary efficacy analysis had an objective response; 67% (95% CI, 53 to 78) had a complete response. In an intention-to-treat analysis involving all 74 patients, 85% had an objective response; 59% had a complete response. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months (range, 7.0 to 32.3), 57% of the 60 patients in the primary efficacy analysis were in remission. At 12 months, the estimated progression-free survival and overall survival were 61% and 83%, respectively. Common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were cytopenias (in 94% of the patients) and infections (in 32%). Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events occurred in 15% and 31% of patients, respectively; none were fatal. Two grade 5 infectious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: KTE-X19 induced durable remissions in a majority of patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. The therapy led to serious and life-threatening toxic effects that were consistent with those reported with other CAR T-cell therapies. (Funded by Kite, a Gilead company; ZUMA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02601313.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1914347

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Munoz, J., Goy, A., Locke, F. L., Jacobson, C. A., Hill, B. T., Timmerman, J. M., Holmes, H., Jaglowski, S., Flinn, I. W., McSweeney, P. A., Miklos, D. B., Pagel, J. M., Kersten, M.-J., Milpied, N., Fung, H., Topp, M. S., Houot, R., Beitinjaneh, A., Peng, W., Zheng, L., Rossi, J. M., Jain, R. K., Rao, A. V., & Reagan, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (M.W.), and Texas Oncology, Dallas (H.H.); Banner M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ (J.M.); John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ (A.G.); Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa (F.L.L.), and the University of Miami, Miami (A.B.) — both in Florida; Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (C.A.J.); Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (B.T.H.), and the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus (S.J.); David Geffen...
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Michael
ORCID
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
382
Issue
14
Pages
1331-1342
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1914347
PMC
PMC7731441
OpenAlex
W3014583893
Cited by
1,862
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 203 · 2025: 249 · 2024: 314 · 2023: 321 · 2022: 366 · 2021: 321 · 2020: 81
FWCI
98.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.nejmgroup.org/legal/terms-of-use.htm (vor)
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Kite, a Gilead Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
tisagenlecleucel, CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, BTK inhibitor resistance, objective response, complete response, progression-free survival, overall survival, cytokine release syndrome, neurological adverse events, cytopenia
MeSH terms
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Leukapheresis, Middle Aged, Recurrence, T-Lymphocytes, Vidarabine, Survival Analysis, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Antigens, CD19, Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review