Cited by 666Pulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Inhaled Treprostinil in Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Interstitial Lung Disease

Open access
Waxman, Aaron, Restrepo-Jaramillo, Ricardo, Thenappan, Thenappan, Ravichandran, Ashwin, Engel, Peter, Bajwa, Abubakr, Allen, Roblee, Feldman, Jeremy +8 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No therapies are currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with interstitial lung disease. The safety and efficacy of inhaled treprostinil for patients with this condition are unclear. METHODS: We enrolled patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension (documented by right heart catheterization) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week trial. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive inhaled treprostinil, administered by means of an ultrasonic, pulsed-delivery nebulizer in up to 12 breaths (total, 72 μg) four times daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the difference between the two groups in the change in peak 6-minute walk distance from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included the change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level at week 16 and the time to clinical worsening. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients underwent randomization, with 163 assigned to inhaled treprostinil and 163 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At week 16, the least-squares mean difference between the treprostinil group and the placebo group in the change from baseline in the 6-minute walk distance was 31.12 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.85 to 45.39; P<0.001). There was a reduction of 15% in NT-proBNP levels from baseline with inhaled treprostinil as compared with an increase of 46% with placebo (treatment ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.72; P<0.001). Clinical worsening occurred in 37 patients (22.7%) in the treprostinil group as compared with 54 patients (33.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92; P = 0.04 by the log-rank test). The most frequently reported adverse events were cough, headache, dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease, inhaled treprostinil improved exercise capacity from baseline, assessed with the use of a 6-minute walk test, as compared with placebo. (Funded by United Therapeutics; INCREASE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02630316.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2008470

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A phase 2 trial of BMS-986278 (admilparant) in 278 IPF patients showed a 62% relative reduction in the rate of change of percent predicted FVC in the 60 mg group versus placebo, with no significant difference in the 30 mg group.

    “A phase 2 trial (NCT04308681) comparing placebo versus 30 mg versus 60 mg in a 1:1:1 distribution of a new LPA1 antagonist BMS-986278 or Admilparant in 278 patients with IPF diagnosed within seven years demonstrated a 62% relative reduction in rate of change of percent predicted FVC (95% CI 0.2 – 3.4) in the 60 mg group in comparison to placebo and no significant difference in the 30 mg group when”

    From Emerging pharmacological options in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (2024) · cites this paper as [94]

    The Methods and Patients sections describe a different trial: 326 patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension were assigned to inhaled treprostinil or placebo. Its primary endpoint was six-minute walk distance, not percent-predicted FVC. The cited paper therefore contradicts the claim’s identification of its drug, trial population, treatment groups, and endpoint; it does not report the claimed BMS-986278 result. Page numbers were not available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The LPA1 receptor has a significant role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis.

    “The LPA1 receptor has been found to have a significant role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis [94,95].”

    From Emerging pharmacological options in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (2024) · cites this paper as [94]

    The Discussion describes a trial of inhaled treprostinil for pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease, not the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Searches for “LPA1 receptor” and “lysophosphatidic acid receptor” found no passage in our copy addressing the receptor’s role. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waxman, A., Restrepo-Jaramillo, R., Thenappan, T., Ravichandran, A., Engel, P., Bajwa, A., Allen, R., Feldman, J., Argula, R., Smith, P., Rollins, K., Deng, C., Peterson, L., Bell, H., Tapson, V., & Nathan, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston (A.W.); the University of South Florida, Tampa (R.R.-J.), and St. Vincent’s Lung, Sleep, and Critical Care Specialists, Jacksonville (A.B.) — both in FL; the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (T.T.); St. Vincent Medical Group, Indianapolis (A.R.); the Carl and Edyth Lindner Research Center at the Christ Hospital, Cincinnati (P.E.); University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento (R. Allen), and Cedars–Sinai, Los Angeles (V.T.); Arizona Pulmonary...
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-01-28
Volume
384
Issue
4
Pages
325-334
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3119793303
Cited by
666
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 2
FWCI
66.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
United Therapeutics Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
inhaled treprostinil, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, 6-minute walk distance, NT-proBNP, exercise capacity, clinical deterioration, adverse events, phosphodiesterase-2 inhibitor, pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment, right heart catheterization, clinical trial safety and efficacy, pulmonary arterial hypertension
MeSH terms
Walk Test, Administration, Inhalation, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Male, Middle Aged, Epoprostenol, Quality of Life, Least-Squares Analysis, Exercise Tolerance, Lung Diseases, Interstitial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review