The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy has been proposed as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of appendicitis. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, nonblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial comparing antibiotic therapy (10-day course) with appendectomy in patients with appendicitis at 25 U.S. centers. The primary outcome was 30-day health status, as assessed with the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health status; noninferiority margin, 0.05 points). Secondary outcomes included appendectomy in the antibiotics group and complications through 90 days; analyses were prespecified in subgroups defined according to the presence or absence of an appendicolith. RESULTS: In total, 1552 adults (414 with an appendicolith) underwent randomization; 776 were assigned to receive antibiotics (47% of whom were not hospitalized for the index treatment) and 776 to undergo appendectomy (96% of whom underwent a laparoscopic procedure). Antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy on the basis of 30-day EQ-5D scores (mean difference, 0.01 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.001 to 0.03). In the antibiotics group, 29% had undergone appendectomy by 90 days, including 41% of those with an appendicolith and 25% of those without an appendicolith. Complications were more common in the antibiotics group than in the appendectomy group (8.1 vs. 3.5 per 100 participants; rate ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.98); the higher rate in the antibiotics group could be attributed to those with an appendicolith (20.2 vs. 3.6 per 100 participants; rate ratio, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.11 to 15.38) and not to those without an appendicolith (3.7 vs. 3.5 per 100 participants; rate ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.43). The rate of serious adverse events was 4.0 per 100 participants in the antibiotics group and 3.0 per 100 participants in the appendectomy group (rate ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.50). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of appendicitis, antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy on the basis of results of a standard health-status measure. In the antibiotics group, nearly 3 in 10 participants had undergone appendectomy by 90 days. Participants with an appendicolith were at a higher risk for appendectomy and for complications than those without an appendicolith. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; CODA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02800785.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J. W., Altman, D. G., & CONSORT Group, F. T. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.87802 · Cited by 2,428
Salminen, P., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Tuominen, R., Hurme, S., Virtanen, J., Mecklin, J.-P., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6154 · Cited by 817
Vons, C., Barry, C., Maitre, S., Pautrat, K., Leconte, M., Costaglioli, B., Karoui, M., Alves, A., Dousset, B., Valleur, P., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60410-8 · Cited by 669
Solomkin, J. S., Mazuski, J. E., Bradley, J. S., Rodvold, K. A., Goldstein, E. J. C., Baron, E. J., O'Neill, P. J., Chow, A. W., Dellinger, E. P., Eachempati, S. R., et al. (2010) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2009.9930 · Cited by 623
The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection
Mazuski, J. E., Tessier, J. M., May, A. K., Sawyer, R. G., Nadler, E. P., Rosengart, M. R., Chang, P. K., O'Neill, P. J., Mollen, K. P., Huston, J. M., et al. (2017) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2016.261 · Cited by 573
Hansson, J., Körner, U., Khorram-Manesh, A., Solberg, A., & Lundholm, K. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6482 · Cited by 500
Salminen, P., Tuominen, R., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Hurme, S., Mecklin, J.-P., Sand, J., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13201 · Cited by 494
American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Cowan, S. W. (2017) · Cited by 399
Cited by
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review
Moris, D., Paulson, E. K., & Pappas, T. N. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.20502 · Cited by 363
Antibiotic use in acute mesenteric ischemia: A review of the evidence and call to action
Tian, Y., Dhara, S., Barrett, C. D., Richman, A. P., & Brahmbhatt, T. S. (2023) · Thrombosis Journal · doi:10.1186/s12959-023-00486-3 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Collaborative, T. C.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2020-11-12
- Volume
- 383
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1907-1919
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4245379858
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 71.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2014320
- The paper
- Collaborative, T. C. (2020). A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2014320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.