Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,766

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Open access
Motzer, Robert, Alekseev, Boris, Rha, Sun-Young, Porta, Camillo, Eto, Masatoshi, Powles, Thomas, Grünwald, Viktor, Hutson, Thomas E., Kopyltsov, Evgeny, Méndez-Vidal, María J., Kozlov, Vadim, Alyasova, Anna, Hong, Sung-Hoo, Kapoor, Anil, Alonso Gordoa, Teresa, Merchan, Jaime R., Winquist, Eric, Maroto, Pablo, Goh, Jeffrey C., Kim, Miso, Gurney, Howard, Patel, Vijay, Peer, Avivit, Procopio, Giuseppe, Takagi, Toshio, Melichar, Bohuslav, Rolland, Frederic, De Giorgi, Ugo, Wong, Shirley, Bedke, Jens, Schmidinger, Manuela, Dutcus, Corina E., Smith, Alan D., Dutta, Lea, Mody, Kalgi, Perini, Rodolfo F., Xing, Dongyuan, Choueiri, Toni K.·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab or everolimus has activity against advanced renal cell carcinoma. The efficacy of these regimens as compared with that of sunitinib is unclear. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1 ratio) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and no previous systemic therapy to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg orally once daily) plus everolimus (5 mg orally once daily), or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily, alternating 4 weeks receiving treatment and 2 weeks without treatment). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Overall survival and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1069 patients were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (355 patients), lenvatinib plus everolimus (357), or sunitinib (357). Progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (median, 23.9 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.49; P<0.001) and was longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (median, 14.7 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.88; P = 0.005) but was not longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.50; P = 0.30). Grade 3 or higher adverse events emerged or worsened during treatment in 82.4% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, 83.1% of those who received lenvatinib plus everolimus, and 71.8% of those who received sunitinib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring in at least 10% of the patients in any group included hypertension, diarrhea, and elevated lipase levels. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than sunitinib. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02811861.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2035716

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 1,766

Metadata

Authors
Motzer, R., Alekseev, B., Rha, S.-Y., Porta, C., Eto, M., Powles, T., Grünwald, V., Hutson, T. E., Kopyltsov, E., Méndez-Vidal, M. J., Kozlov, V., Alyasova, A., Hong, S.-H., Kapoor, A., Alonso Gordoa, T., Merchan, J. R., Winquist, E., Maroto, P., Goh, J. C., Kim, M., Gurney, H., Patel, V., Peer, A., Procopio, G., Takagi, T., Melichar, B., Rolland, F., De Giorgi, U., Wong, S., Bedke, J., Schmidinger, M., Dutcus, C. E., Smith, A. D., Dutta, L., Mody, K., Perini, R. F., Xing, D., & Choueiri, T. K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
384
Issue
14
Pages
1289-1300
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3131063362
Cited by
1,766
References
18
FWCI
183.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2035716
The paper
Motzer, R., Alekseev, B., Rha, S.-Y., Porta, C., Eto, M., Powles, T., Grünwald, V., Hutson, T. E., Kopyltsov, E., Méndez-Vidal, M. J., Kozlov, V., Alyasova, A., Hong, S.-H., Kapoor, A., Alonso Gordoa, T., Merchan, J. R., Winquist, E., Maroto, P., Goh, J. C., . . . Choueiri, T. K. (2021). Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2035716

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.