Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer

Open access
Tewari, Krishnansu S., Monk, Bradley J., Vergote, Ignace, Miller, Austin, de Melo, Andreia C., Kim, Hee-Seung, Kim, Yong Man, Lisyanskaya, Alla, Samouëlian, Vanessa, Lorusso, Domenica, Damian, Fernanda, Chang, Chih-Long, Gotovkin, Evgeniy A., Takahashi, Shunji, Ramone, Daniella, Pikiel, Joanna, Maćkowiak-Matejczyk, Beata, Guerra Alía, Eva M., Colombo, Nicoletta, Makarova, Yulia, Rischin, Danny, Lheureux, Stephanie, Hasegawa, Kosei, Fujiwara, Keiichi, Li, Jingjin, Jamil, Shaheda, Jankovic, Vladimir, Chen, Chieh-I, Seebach, Frank, Weinreich, David M., Yancopoulos, George D., Lowy, Israel, Mathias, Melissa, Fury, Matthew G., Oaknin, Ana·2022·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Cemiplimab, the fully human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved to treat lung and skin cancers, has been shown to have preliminary clinical activity in this population. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had disease progression after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, regardless of their programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Progression-free survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 608 women were enrolled (304 in each group). In the overall trial population, median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group (12.0 months vs. 8.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent in both histologic subgroups (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [including adenosquamous carcinoma]). Progression-free survival was also longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; two-sided P<0.001). In the overall population, an objective response occurred in 16.4% (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.1) of the patients in the cemiplimab group, as compared with 6.3% (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.6) in the chemotherapy group. An objective response occurred in 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) of the cemiplimab-treated patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 1% and in 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) of those with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Overall, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 45.0% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 53.4% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03257267.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2112187

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Tewari, K. S., Monk, B. J., Vergote, I., Miller, A., de Melo, A. C., Kim, H.-S., Kim, Y. M., Lisyanskaya, A., Samouëlian, V., Lorusso, D., Damian, F., Chang, C.-L., Gotovkin, E. A., Takahashi, S., Ramone, D., Pikiel, J., Maćkowiak-Matejczyk, B., Guerra Alía, E. M., Colombo, N., Makarova, Y., Rischin, D., Lheureux, S., Hasegawa, K., Fujiwara, K., Li, J., Jamil, S., Jankovic, V., Chen, C.-I., Seebach, F., Weinreich, D. M., Yancopoulos, G. D., Lowy, I., Mathias, M., Fury, M. G., & Oaknin, A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2022-02-10
Volume
386
Issue
6
Pages
544-555
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4210971182
Cited by
458
References
4
FWCI
81.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2112187
The paper
Tewari, K. S., Monk, B. J., Vergote, I., Miller, A., de Melo, A. C., Kim, H.-S., Kim, Y. M., Lisyanskaya, A., Samouëlian, V., Lorusso, D., Damian, F., Chang, C.-L., Gotovkin, E. A., Takahashi, S., Ramone, D., Pikiel, J., Maćkowiak-Matejczyk, B., Guerra Alía, E. M., Colombo, N., . . . Oaknin, A. (2022). Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2112187

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.