The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Results of Two Cases of Pig-to-Human Kidney Xenotransplantation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Xenotransplantation may offer a transformative solution to the worldwide organ shortage crisis1–3.”
From Design and testing of a humanized porcine donor for xenotransplantation (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1007/s12033-017-0024-9 · DOI
- Cooper DK. A brief history of cross-species organ transplantation. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2012;25:49-57.22275786
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002977 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trim.2016.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/ajt.15329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-020-66311-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90261-I · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)77900-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/imr.12152 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.TP.0000064335.50622.20 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02849.x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-61779-845-0_12 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm1172 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a015685 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1478951516001061 · DOI
- 10.1136/medethics-2019-105674 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm1105-1145 · DOI
- 10.1111/ajt.14165 · DOI
- 10.1111/jlme.12137 · DOI
- 10.1017/S096318010413404X · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3089.1996.tb00151.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00007890-199912150-00011 · DOI
- 10.1111/ajt.14725 · DOI
- 10.1111/xen.12102 · DOI
- 10.1111/ajt.14625 · DOI
- 10.1681/ASN.2012070653 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3089.1998.tb00025.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3089.1996.tb00155.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3089.1996.tb00156.x · DOI
- Magnusson S, Strokan V, Mölne J, Nilsson K, Rydberg L, Breimer ME. Blocking of human anti-pig xenoantibodies by soluble GAL alpha 1-3Gal and Gal alpha 1-2Gal disaccharides; studies in a pig kidney in vitro perfusion model. Transpl Int 2000;13:402-412.11140238
- Otte KE, Andersen N, Jørgensen KA, et al. Xenoperfusion of pig kidney with human AB or O whole blood. Transplant Proc 1990;22:1091-1092.2349669
- 10.1159/000485163 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0307819101 · DOI
- 10.1111/xen.12293 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/xen.12708 · DOI
- 10.1111/tri.13273 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.285.5431.1236 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Design and testing of a humanized porcine donor for xenotransplantation
Anand, R. P., Layer, J. V., Heja, D., Hirose, T., Lassiter, G., Firl, D. J., Paragas, V. B., Akkad, A., Chhangawala, S., Colvin, R. B., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06594-4 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Montgomery, R. A., Stern, J. M., Lonze, B. E., Tatapudi, V. S., Mangiola, M., Wu, M., Weldon, E., Lawson, N., Deterville, C., Dieter, R. A., Sullivan, B., Boulton, G., Parent, B., Piper, G., Sommer, P., Cawthon, S., Duggan, E., Ayares, D., Dandro, A., Fazio-Kroll, A., Kokkinaki, M., Burdorf, L., Lorber, M., Boeke, J. D., Pass, H., Keating, B., Griesemer, A., Ali, N. M., Mehta, S. A., & Stewart, Z. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2022-05-19
- Volume
- 386
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1889-1898
- ISSN
- 0028-4793
- 1533-4406
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Lung Biotechnology PBC, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Therapeutics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review