The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Dostarlimab is an immune-checkpoint inhibitor that targets the programmed cell death 1 receptor. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may have synergistic effects in the treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent endometrial cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dostarlimab (500 mg) or placebo, plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 5 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area), every 3 weeks (six cycles), followed by dostarlimab (1000 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 494 patients who underwent randomization, 118 (23.9%) had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. In the dMMR-MSI-H population, estimated progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.3 to 73.4) in the dostarlimab group and 15.7% (95% CI, 7.2 to 27.0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.50; P<0.001). In the overall population, progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% (95% CI, 29.3 to 42.9) in the dostarlimab group and 18.1% (95% CI, 13.0 to 23.9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% (95% CI, 64.5 to 77.1) with dostarlimab and 56.0% (95% CI, 48.9 to 62.5) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87). The most common adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment were nausea (53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% of those in the placebo group), alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%), and fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%). Severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a substantial benefit in the dMMR-MSI-H population. (Funded by GSK; RUBY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03981796.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699
Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade
Le, D. T., Durham, J. N., Smith, K. N., Wang, H., Bartlett, B. R., Aulakh, L. K., Lu, S., Kemberling, H., Wilt, C., Luber, B. S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6733 · Cited by 6,645
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer
Gandhi, L., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Gadgeel, S., Esteban, E., Felip, E., De Angelis, F., Domine, M., Clingan, P., Hochmair, M. J., Powell, S. F., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1801005 · Cited by 6,607
Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC
Socinski, M. A., Jotte, R. M., Cappuzzo, F., Orlandi, F., Stroyakovskiy, D., Nogami, N., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Moro-Sibilot, D., Thomas, C. A., Barlesi, F., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1716948 · Cited by 3,733
Paz-Ares, L., Dvorkin, M., Chen, Y., Reinmuth, N., Hotta, K., Trukhin, D., Statsenko, G., Hochmair, M. J., Özgüroğlu, M., Ji, J. H., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32222-6 · Cited by 2,298
Cited by
Siegel, R. L., Giaquinto, A. N., & Jemal, A. (2024) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21820 · Cited by 9,533
Westin, S. N., Moore, K., Chon, H. S., Lee, J.-Y., Thomes Pepin, J., Sundborg, M., Shai, A., de la Garza, J., Nishio, S., Gold, M. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.02132 · Cited by 380
Self-citationKoeneman, B. J., Schreibelt, G., Gorris, M. A. J., Hins - de Bree, S., Westdorp, H., Ottevanger, P. B., & de Vries, I. J. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368103 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirza, M. R., Chase, D. M., Slomovitz, B. M., dePont Christensen, R., Novák, Z., Black, D., Gilbert, L., Sharma, S., Valabrega, G., Landrum, L. M., Hanker, L. C., Stuckey, A., Boere, I., Gold, M. A., Auranen, A., Pothuri, B., Cibula, D., McCourt, C., Raspagliesi, F., Shahin, M. S., Gill, S. E., Monk, B. J., Buscema, J., Herzog, T. J., Copeland, L. J., Tian, M., He, Z., Stevens, S., Zografos, E., Coleman, R. L., & Powell, M. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2023-06-08
- Volume
- 388
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2145-2158
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4360991857
- Cited by
- 862
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 236.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2216334
- The paper
- Mirza, M. R., Chase, D. M., Slomovitz, B. M., dePont Christensen, R., Novák, Z., Black, D., Gilbert, L., Sharma, S., Valabrega, G., Landrum, L. M., Hanker, L. C., Stuckey, A., Boere, I., Gold, M. A., Auranen, A., Pothuri, B., Cibula, D., McCourt, C., Raspagliesi, F., . . . Powell, M. A. (2023). Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2216334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.