Putting U.S. Health Care on the Right Track
Abstract
Americans do not consistently receive high-value health care. Collectively, our country spends more on health care than any other nation, but our people do not receive the best outcomes, safety, service, or access in return. Although some organizations, regions, and states deliver high-quality, affordable care, many do not. It's time to make high-value health care the norm in the United States.To reach that goal, we must hold physicians and other providers accountable for providing high-value health care, defined in terms of both quality and cost: value=quality÷cost. In this equation, quality includes clinical outcomes, safety, and patient-reported satisfaction, and cost . . .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quality incorporates clinical outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction.
“Quality incorporates clinical outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction [1].”
From Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
Pay-for-Performance or Pay for Value?
Smoldt, R. K., & Cortese, D. A. (2007) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/82.2.210 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial
Thompson, J. C., Cichowski, S. B., Rogers, R. G., Qeadan, F., Zambrano, J., Wenzl, C., Jeppson, P. C., Dunivan, G. C., & Komesu, Y. M. (2019) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cortese, D. A., & Korsmo, J. O.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 361
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1326-1327
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1974400836
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- high-value care, quality of care, health care costs, provider accountability, value-based care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, health care access, health care spending
- MeSH terms
- Medicare, Health Policy, Health Services, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Reimbursement Mechanisms, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
