Cited by 84Hospital Admissions and OutcomesInnovations in Medical EducationHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

ACGME Duty-Hour Recommendations — A National Survey of Residency Program Directors

Open access
Antiel, Ryan M., Thompson, Scott M., Reed, Darcy A., James, Katherine M., Tilburt, Jon C., Bannon, Michael P., Fischer, Philip R., Farley, David R.·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Taking into consideration the Institute of Medicine's 2008 recommendations regarding residents' duty hours,1 the 16-member Duty Hour Task Force of the Accreditation Council for GraduateMedical Education (ACGME) recently published proposed new recommendations,2 which, as eventually approved, would go into effect in July 2011. These recommendations represent a continuing commitment by the ACGME to both “foster a humanistic environment for graduate medical education” and ensure “excellent and safe patient care.”2 The ACGME has solicited comments from the educational community and will modify its proposal as needed.The recommendations represent an attempt to address elements of the 2003 ACGME standards that generated . . .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmp1008305

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antiel, R. M., Thompson, S. M., Reed, D. A., James, K. M., Tilburt, J. C., Bannon, M. P., Fischer, P. R., & Farley, D. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-08-19
Volume
363
Issue
8
Pages
e12
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2046273268
Cited by
84
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024150)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
graduate medical education, duty hours, residency program directors, resident work hours, patient safety, humanistic environment, Institute of Medicine recommendations
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Adult, Age Factors, Attitude of Health Personnel, Data Collection, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Middle Aged, Pediatrics, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, General Surgery, United States, Logistic Models, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review