Improving Clinical Learning Environments for Tomorrow's Physicians
Abstract
Interview with Dr. Eileen Reynolds on the ACGME's review of clinical learning environments and its goals for residency programs. (11:33)Download On the basis of site visits that it has conducted for its Clinical Learning Environment Review program, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reports finding a generalized lack of resident engagement in systems-based practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within a trusting and supportive relationship, feedback is more likely to be viewed as credible.
“Within a trusting and supportive relationship, feedback is also more likely to be viewed as credible [50, 78].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [78]
Cites
The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.
Nasca, T., Philibert, I., Brigham, T., & Flynn, T. C. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr1200117 · Cited by 1,565 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating Obstetrical Residency Programs Using Patient Outcomes
Asch, D. A. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1356 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Weiss, K. B., Wagner, R., & Nasca, T. J. (2012) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-04-03-31 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationBatalden, P. B., & Davidoff, F. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.9.1059 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education.
Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nasca, T. J., Weiss, K. B., & Bagian, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2014-03-13
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 991-993
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2036780962
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- clinical learning environment, residency training, ACGME accreditation, systems-based practice, resident engagement, graduate medical education, physician training
- MeSH terms
- Accreditation, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Graduate, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Internship and Residency, Learning, Quality of Health Care, United States, Quality Improvement, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review