The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bringing the Common Rule into the 21st Century
Open accessAbstract
Proposed revisions to the rules governing the ethical conduct of research involving humans aim to enhance respect and safeguards for research participants and to increase research efficiency by reducing unnecessary burdens and calibrating oversight to the level of risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although the NPRM does not mention Henrietta Lacks, her influence is clear in a publication about the proposed changes authored by leaders of these reforms (65), which stated that “the controversy that followed the 2013 publication of the genome sequence of the HeLa cell line…underscores the need for greater involvement of and respect for research participants” (p. 2293) and that “just as the L”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hudson, K. L., & Collins, F. S. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/500141a · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1126/science.1229566 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2470 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens
Beskow, L. M. (2016) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022536 · Cited by 146
“Although the NPRM does not mention Henrietta Lacks, her influence is clear in a publication about the proposed changes authored by leaders of these reforms (65), which stated that “the controversy that followed the 2013 publication of the genome sequence of the HeLa cell line.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, K. L., & Collins, F. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Collins, Francis S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2015-12-10
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2293-2296
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC5101946
- OpenAlex
- W1842567330
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 31
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- Common Rule, research ethics, research participant protection, regulatory burden, research oversight, risk-based regulation, research ethics committees
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Human Experimentation, Informed Consent, Specimen Handling, United States, Ethics Committees, Research, Codes of Ethics, Government Regulation, Research Subjects, United States Government Agencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
