Cited by 55Research Data Management PracticesElectronic Health Records SystemsEthics in Clinical Research

Data sharing at a crossroads

Open access
Rockhold, Frank, Nisen, Perry, Freeman, Andrew·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The clinical research community needs to find the best ways to realize the benefits of data sharing while minimizing the risks. Multiple different approaches and systems may be creating a fragmented, complex landscape in which the full benefits will not be realized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmp1608086

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across all fields of medicine, articles labeled with research misconduct take almost 4 years on average to be retracted.

    “On average, it takes almost 4 years for articles labeled with research misconduct to be retracted across all fields of medicine.11”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bierer BE, Li R, Barnes M, Sim I. A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 2411-3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rockhold, F., Nisen, P., & Freeman, A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-09-22
Volume
375
Issue
12
Pages
1115-1117
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2521523576
Cited by
55
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
18.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
data sharing, clinical research, research data management, data sharing risks, data sharing system
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Costs and Cost Analysis, Access to Information, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review